SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Ker) 338

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
Mathew Alex, S/o. Alex Mathew - Petitioner
Vs.
The Kanjirappally Grama Panchayath, Represented by its Secretary, Kanjirappally Grama Panchayath, Kanjirappally & Ors. - Respondents
W.P(C).No.2080 of 2011
Decided On : 25-05-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. Rajeev V. Kurup, Sri. Alex M. Scaria.
For the Respondents: Sri. V.K. Sunil, Smt. Nima Jacob, Senior Government Pleader Sri. Saigi Jacob Palatty.

Headnote:Constitution of India, Art.21 - Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, S. 15 - As the desire the person is having right as to change and alter the name of that individual as under article 21 of the Indian constitution as well as in the common law as on the reason the fundamental rights guaranteed to the individual -No application can be rejected on the ground of absence of the provision for correction under the act.

JUDGMENT :

The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned Ext.P-9 proceedings dated 16.9.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent-Registrar of Births and Deaths of the 1st respondent-Kanjirappally Grama Panchayath, whereby the request made by him as per Ext.P-6 for change of his name in the Birth Register has been rejected. The main prayers in this Writ Petition (Civil) filed on 19.1.2011 are as follows :

“[A] Issue an order quashing Exbt.P9 after calling for the production of the records pursuant to which Exbt.P9 is passed.

[B] Issue a direction or order directing the 2nd respondent to correct the name of the petitioner in the birth register kept by it pertaining to the petitioner in accordance with the name shown in the school admission register-Exbt.P2.”

2. Heard Sri. Rajeev V. Kurup, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri. V.K. Sunil, learned counsel appearing for R-1 & R-2 and Sri. Saigi Jacob Palatty, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for R-3 State.

3. As per the averments in the Writ Petition, at the time of the birth of the petitioner, he was given the pet name as “Albin” by his parents and his name was entered as “Albin Alex” before the 2nd respondent-Registrar of Births and Deaths. This can be seen from a perusal of Ext.P-1, wherein it is shown that the name of the child is shown as “Albin Alex” and his date of birth is 30.12.1996 and birth was registered with the 2nd respondent on 31.12.1996 and the names of the father and mother of the child are “Alex Mathew” and “Ancy Alex”, etc. Ext.P-1 is the Certificate of Birth issued on 26.3.1997 by the 2nd respondent Registrar of Births and Deaths of the 1st respondent- Kanjirappally Grama Panchayath, Kottayam District. As the name of the paternal grandfather of the petitioner is “Mathew”, petitioner's parents, had given him the baptismal name as “Mathew” as can be seen from Ext.P-3 baptismal certificate dated 10.4.1997 issued by the parish concerned. Ext.P-4 would show that a male child was born on 30.12.1996 to “Smt. Ancy Alex, W/o. Alex Mathew”. The petitioner's name in the school register at the time of admission in the school was entered as “Mathew Alex”, the first name denoting his baptismal name taken from the name of his paternal grandfather and surname which shows the name of the child's father. The petitioner and his parents have been advised that in the future it may be necessary that his name as entered in the school register has to be shown in the birth register after requisite correction as otherwise it would have problems at the time of issuance of Passport as the Passport authorities certainly insist for production of birth certificate and if there are divergences in the name of the applicant concerned as shown in the birth register from the other records like school records, etc., they would insist for change of name in the birth register. Frequent problems would also arise when applications for foreign visa are submitted, whereby many of the Foreign Governments may insist for placing reliance on the name of the candidate concerned as shown in the birth register. In these circumstances, Ext.P-6 application was submitted on behalf of the petitioner-minor through his father and guardian Sri.Alex Mathew on 3.9.2010 before the 2nd respondent-Registrar of Births and Deaths requesting for correction/change of name in Ext.P-1 birth certificate. It was pointed out in Ext.P-6 that immediately after his birth on 30.12.1996, petitioner's pet name was given as “Albin” and it is in these circumstances, his name was shown as “Albin Alex” in the request in that regard submitted before the Registrar of Births on 31.12.1996, which led to the issuance of Ext.P-1 birth certificate dated 26.3.1997, wherein the name of the petitioner was shown as “Albin Alex”. It was only later that baptism was conducted and his first name was chosen as “Mathew”, which is taken from his paternal grandfather and hence the petitioner's name was entered in the school records as “Mathew Alex” and not as





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top