SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Ker) 433

P.UBAID
Joonus – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: V. Philip Mathews
For the Respondent: Spl. Government Pleader (T.P. Madhu)

ORDER :

The revision petitioners herein are the accused Nos.1 and 3 in C.C.No.625 of 1998 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate’s Court, Ranny. They faced prosecution in the court below on the allegation that on 17.12.1997, they trespassed into the Government Reserve Forest within the Goodrical Forest Range, cut a “kalmanikkam” tree, and attempted to remove the logs. The prosecution case is that they were intercepted by a team of forest guards, they were arrested by them, and the logs were taken into custody along with a sword seen at the place of detection. After investigation, the Forest Range Officer submitted complaint against three accused. The second accused remained absent throughout the trial, and so the case against them was split up and re-filed.

2. The accused Nos.1 and 3 faced trial before the learned Magistrate. They pleaded not guilty to the charge framed against them under Ss.27(i)(e)(iii) and 27(i)(e)(iv) of the Kerala Forest Act. The prosecution examined four witnesses, and proved Exts.P1 to P3 documents in the trial court. The MO1 weapon was also identified during trial. Both the accused denied the incriminating circumstances, when examined under S.313 Cr.P.C. They





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top