SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Ker) 577

HRISHIKESH ROY, A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
Kerala State Road Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Saju Varkey – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. P.C. Chacko
For the Respondents: Sri. I. Dinesh Menon, Sri. P. Santhosh Kumar

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.

The writ appeals arise from a common judgment dated 15.03.2018 of a learned single judge, allowing the writ petitions preferred by private stage carriage operators, seeking a consideration of their applications for variation/extension of their temporary route permits, on non-notified routes. The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation is the appellant in the appeals, and they impugn the aforesaid judgment on the ground that the directions contained therein militate against the express provisions of clause (4) of the Scheme dated 25.03.2017, framed under Section 99 of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

2. When the writ appeals came up for admission before us, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents in the writ appeals that, writ petitions have been filed challenging the validity of clause (4) of the Scheme dated 25.03.2017, and as the pleadings in the said writ petitions were complete, the writ petitions were ripe for hearing. As a decision in the said writ petitions will have a bearing on the writ appeals as well, we c

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top