A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

1. These appeals arise out of matrimonial dispute between Radhamony and Surendran. O.P.(HMA).No.1488/2005 has been filed by the husband seeking divorce. O.P.No.705/2005 has been filed by the wife for return of 80 sovereigns of gold ornaments which according to her has been appropriated by her husband after marriage. O.P.No.858/2005 has been filed to declare Ext.A1 document as sham and void. The petitions filed by the wife were dismissed and the divorce petition filed by the husband was allowed against which the wife has filed these appeals.

2. The short facts of the case are as under and the parties are described as husband and wife:

The parties got married as per Hindu religious rites and ceremonies on 9.9.1991. A girl child was born in the wedlock and at the time of filing of O.P.(HMA).No.1488/2005 she was 13 years old. The husband alleged that after the marriage, she was behaving in a cruel manner against him. He was employed abroad and during the relevant time while she was at the matrimonial home she never behaved properly to his parents. She was in greed of money and when ever he came back, she was harassing him like anything. He had even brought her