V.CHITAMBARESH
Confident Projects India Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
1. There is no, case that Ext.P4 building permit was issued by mistake or that a patent error has crept in it or that the permit was happened to be issued on misrepresentation of fact or law or that the construction if carried on, will be a threat to life or property, warranting its suspension or revocation under Rule 18 of the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, 2011. Therefore, no additional conditions could be imposed while renewing the license in terms of Section 17 of the said rules and Ext.P11 order imposing additional conditions, including the necessity to obtain permission from the District Town Planner is hereby quashed.
2. Respondents 2 and 3 are directed to pass orders on Ext.P9 application for renewal of Ext.P4 building permit in terms of Rule 17 of the above rules, without insisting on any new condition as regards permission from the District Town Planner in terms of Rule 55 of the Rules.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.