SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ker) 1516

P.UBAID
Vikraman – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Joseph George
For the Respondent: Sr. Government Pleader (Alex M. Thombra)

JUDGMENT :

1. The appellant herein challenges the conviction and sentence against him under S.8(2) of the Kerala Abkari Act (‘the Act’ for short) in S.C.698/2006 of the Court of Session, Pathanamthitta.

2. The prosecution case is that, at about 4.45 p.m. on 3.12.2004, the accused was found possessing 11/2 litres of arrack in a plastic can. On seeing the Police party led by the Sub Inspector of Police, Pulikeezhu, the accused abandoned the plastic can containing arrack, and he ran off and escaped. When the Sub Inspector examined the plastic can, he found 11/2 litres of arrack therein. It was seized as per a mahazar. On 823 the basis of the seizure, and also on the basis of the details given by the witnesses, who witnessed the incident, the Sub Inspector registered the F.I.R against the accused. The Sub Inspector himself investigated the case and submitted final report also in court. On committal, the case came up before the Court of Session from where it was made over to the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc) I, Pathanamthitta for trial and disposal.

3. The accused appeared before the trial court and pleaded not guilty to the charge framed against him under S.8(2) of the Act. Th






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top