K.T.KOSHI, M.S.MENON, N.VARADARAJA IYENGAR
Janardhanan – Appellant
Versus
Kuppandy – Respondent
M.S. MENON, J.
1. The plaintiff in O. S. No. 316 of 1951 of the Court of the District Munsiff of Palghat is the appellant in this second appeal. The suit was for redemption and recovery of possession of the items of property specified in the plaint and for consequential reliefs. The trial court said:
“In the result, the suit is decreed for redemption and possession against the defendants with future purappad at the rate of 110 paras of paddy a year on payment of Rs.222-13-9 as mortgage amount and Rs.194-2-6 as value of improvements. Set off allowed. Both parties to bear their costs “
2. The defendants appealed to the Court of the Subordinate Judge of South Malabar at Palghat. The Judge allowed the said appeal, A. S. No. 117 of 1954:
“In the result, the appeal is allowed, the decree of the lower court is modified and the plaintiff is given a decree for Rs.449-11-8, the arrears of purappad claimed in the plaint, and costs of suit. The suit for redemption and possession is dismissed with costs of the defendants. In appeal the appellants will get their full costs from the respondent.”
3. The document concerned is Ext. B1 dated 30-12-1919. The decision of the Subordinate Judge is b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.