SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 1610

A.M.SHAFFIQUE
Sivaranjini S. Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Murali Pallath

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner is a minor represented through her father. Petitioner is a 9th standard student in G.H.S.S., Mathil, Payyanur. The petitioner wants to correct her name in the school records. She made a representation in that regard to the 2nd respondent—the Joint Commissioner. Her request has been considered by the 2nd respondent vide Ext. P-l1 and the petitioner has been directed to move the Headmaster/Headmistress of the school after gazette notification. The petitioner submits that her request also has been declined by the 4th respondent-Headmistress. The petitioner approached this Court aggrieved by Ext. P-ll direction.

2. As per the Circular issued by the Commissioner of Government Examination dated 22-9-2012 based on the Government Order No.323 dated 16-2-2012, the authority to correct the school records of the student from 1st standard to 10th standard who are on the roll, is Headmaster/Headmistress. The circular prescribes the method in which such application has to be filed.

3. Therefore, I am of the view that the petitioner has to approach the 4th respondent and has to remit necessary fee for the same. The petitioner shall make a request in the prescribed forma


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top