SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Ker) 1004

S.RAVINDRA BHAT
Rohit Shekhar – Appellant
Versus
N. D. Tiwari – Respondent


ORDER :

The plaintiff by this application seeks a direction to the first defendant to furnish blood samples for enabling the DNA testing.

2. Briefly, the facts are that the plaintiff claims a decree for declaration that the first defendant is his biological father. The second defendant (hereafter referred to as Ujjawala Sharma) is the plaintiffs mother. Apparently, he (first defendant) was a Member of Parliament during the period 1967-1980. It is contended that Ujjawala Sharma was active in politics and involved in activities of All India Young Woman Congress apart from her job as Sanskrit Lecturer at Daulat Ram College. The plaintiff also contends that Ujjawala Sharma was previously married to Sh. B.P. Sharma from whom she was estranged. Apparently, she and her husband Sh. B.P. Sharma had a son Siddhartha Sharma. The plaintiff contends that the first defendant did not have any child from his marriage, and, as he was very fond of Ujjawala Sharma and even wanted to marry her, he convinced her to have his child promising that he would divorce his wife and give his name to the child to be borne by her (i.e. Ujjawala Sharma). The plaintiff submits that believing the first defendant and d

































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top