SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Ker) 256

ALEXANDER THOMAS
Sreekumar. V. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. Siraj Karoly
For the Respondent: Sri. Saigi Jacob Palatty, Public Prosecutor

ORDER :

Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.468 of 2019 of Medical College Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, which has been registered for the offences punishable under Section 509 of the IPC, Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 120(o) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011.

2. The brief of the prosecution case is that the lady de facto complainant in this case is an Assistant Professor of Law and also a media person and that with the intention to insult the womanhood and the reputation of the lady de facto complainant and to cause mental distress on the lady de facto complainant, the petitioner (accused) had made postings in her Facebook account, which has the effect of raising lascivious interest on the people who sees it and has also sent obscene messages to insult her womanhood by making such postings in her Facebook account.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that indisputably the offences under Section 509 of the IPC and Section 120(o) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011 are bailable offences and further that going by the nature of the factual allegations raised in the first information statement, the offence under Section 67






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top