SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Ker) 975

P.UBAID
Smithesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Nireesh Mathew.
For the Respondent: Government Pleader (Santhosh Peter).

JUDGMENT :

The appellant herein is the 1st accused in S.C. 258/2010 of the Court of Session, Palakkad. The accused Nos.2 and 3 obtained discharge from the trial court. The 1st accused faced trial before the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc)-III, Palakkad under S.55(a) of the Kerala Abkari Act (for short “the Act”) on the allegation that at about 1 p.m. on 26.1.2007, he was found transporting huge quantity of spirit contained in 18 plastic cans of 35 litres capacity in his Car No.KL-9G-910. The offence was detected by the Sub Inspector of Police, Kozhinjampara. He arrested the accused on the spot and seized the contraband articles including the car as per a mahazar. On the basis of the arrest and seizure, the Sub Inspector registered the crime, and investigation was taken over by the Circle Inspector. After investigation, the Circle Inspector submitted final report in court.

2. The accused appeared before the learned trial Judge and pleaded not guilty to the charge framed against him under S.55(a) of the Act. The prosecution examined six witnesses and proved Exts.P1 to P9 documents in the trial court. The MO1 to MO18 properties were also identified during trial. Those are said











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top