SHIRCY V.
Mukkani Fathima, D/o. Mammu – Appellant
Versus
Kundu Valappil Fathima D/o. Moidu – Respondent
This appeal arises out of a judgment dated 21-10-2009 in O.S. No. 318/2008 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Thalassery whereby a decree of specific performance of agreement for sale of the plaint A and B schedule properties was granted in favour of the plaintiff/respondent.
2. The facts of the case in a nutshell are as follows:
The plaint A schedule property belongs to 1st defendant/1st appellant by virtue of document No.2392/2004 of SRO, Ancharakandy. The plaint B schedule property belongs to the 2nd defendant/2nd appellant who is the husband of the 1st appellant by virtue of document No.1314/2005 of SRO, Ancharakandy. The properties are lying contiguously as one plot. The appellants and the respondent/plaintiff entered into an agreement for sale of the properties on 11.6.2007 for a sale consideration of Rs.8000/- per cent. An advance amount of Rs.75,000/- was paid on the very same day. The time fixed for execution of the sale deed was six months. A power of attorney was also executed by RFA 115/2010 3 the 2nd appellant/2nd defendant in favour of the 1st appellant for execution of the sale deed. Apart from the advance amount the respondent paid an amount of Rs.8000 on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.