JUDGMENT :

The petitioner, who is stated to be the owner of 12.95 Ares of property in Survey No.1006/7A; 13.75 Ares of property in Survey No.1007/1A; and 4.05 Ares of property in Survey No.1007/1B of Kothamangalam Village, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P8 order dated 17.05.2018 of the 1st respondent Revenue Divisional Officer, to the extent it stipulates that the permission granted under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967 should not be acted upon without effecting changes in the revenue records as per the provisions under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Ordinance, 2017 and for setting apart 10% of the total area of the land, by quashing condition Nos.1 and 4 in the said order. The petitioner has also sought for a declaration that the provisions contained in Section 27A and Section 27C of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland (Amendment) Ordinance, 2017 is unconstitutional; a declaration that the conditions stipulated in Ext.P8 order that the permission granted thereby under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967 would be