P.B.SURESH KUMAR
J. Gopakumar S/o. Janardhanan – Appellant
Versus
Kamalamma M/o. The Deceased Rajan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
1. Among these appeals, M.A.C.A No.1029 of 2011 is by the claimants in a proceedings for compensation before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and M.A.C.A. No.2292 of 2013 is by the owner of the vehicle involved in the accident which is the subject matter of the said proceedings.
2. One Rajan died on 20.08.2005 on account of the injuries sustained by him in an accident took place on 19.08.2005 involving a motor cycle. The deceased was aged 56 years. He was a carpenter. The mother, wife and four children of the deceased initiated the proceedings for compensation before the Tribunal. They claimed a sum of Rs.4,00,000/-by way of compensation. The owner and rider of the vehicle remained ex parte. The insurer of the vehicle contested the proceedings, contending that the rider of the vehicle had no licence to ride the vehicle and as such, they are not liable to indemnify the owner of the liability arising out of the accident. The Tribunal found that the claimants are entitled to a sum of Rs.2,22,000/-by way of compensation. It also found that the rider of the vehicle had no licence. In the circumstances, the Tribunal passed an award permitting the claimants
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Swaran Singh 2004(1) KLT 781 (SC)
Ramachandrappa v. Manager, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited
Syed Sadiq v. Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation and another (2009) 6 SCC 121
National Insurance Company Ltd v. Pranay Sethi 2017(4) KLT 662 (SC)
Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram and others 2018 ACJ 2782
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.