SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ker) 1538

P.UBAID
SUDHEESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

(1) The appellants challenge the conviction and sentence against them under section 55(a) of the Kerala Abkari Act ('the Act' for short) in S.C 159/2010 of the Court of Session, Palakkad.

(2) The prosecution case is that, at about 10.30 a.m on 24.3.2009, they were found transporting a huge quantity of 1120 litres of spirit contained in 35 plastic jars in the vehicle No.TN63V.2914. They were arrested on the spot by the Circle Inspector of Excise, Chittoor, and the contraband articles including the vehicle were seized as per mahazar. The Circle Inspector in turn produced the properties and the accused in the Excise Range Office, where an Assistant Excise Inspector registered the crime. He also produced the properties before the Deputy Commissioner of Excise. Investigation was taken over by an Excise Inspector of the Palakkad Excise Enforcement and Anti-Narocotic Special Squad, and he also submitted final report in court. After complying with the procedure, the case was committed to Crl.A No.973 of 2012 the Court of Session by the committal court, and the case was later made over to the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc No.1), Palakkad for trial and disposal.

(3) The accu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top