ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Kottamom (Kottiyar Mangalam) Sri Darmasastha Temple Advisory Committee, Rep. By Its Secretary Mr. K. Pradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented By The Secretary, Home Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner, the Temple Advisory Committee of Kottiyarmangalam Sree Dharma Sastha Temple under the 2nd respondent Travancore Devaswom Board, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P3 decision No.4(4) dated 16.01.2016 of the 3rd respondent Chenkal Grama Panchayat; Ext.P10 proceedings dated 08.08.2018 of the Secretary of the Grama Panchayat; and Ext.P12 sketch prepared by the Secretary of the Grama Panchayat for autorickshaw parking at Kottamam Junction. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 9 not to permit or establish an autorickshaw stand in front of the petitioner's temple or at any point the temple property touches the National Highway.
2. On 28.05.2019, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned Government Pleader took notice on admission for respondents 1, 4 to 6 and 8. The learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board took notice on admission for the 2nd respondent. The learned Standing Counsel for National Highways Authority of India took notice on admission for the 9th respondent. Urgent notice on admission by sp
Avishek Goenka v. Union of India (2012) 5 SCC 321
Saji K.M. v. Deputy Transport Commissioner and others 2019 (3) KHC 836
S. Rajaseekaran v. Union of India (2014) 6 SCC 36
S. Rajaseekaran v. Union of India (2018) 13 SCC 532
Noushad M. and others v. State of Kerala and others 2019 (2) KHC 562
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.