SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Ker) 885

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, R. NARAYANA PISHARADI, JJ.
The District Geologist, Department of Mining and Geology, Thrissur District and Ors - Appellant
Versus
Sivaraman, S/o. Ayyappankutty and Ors - Respondent
W.A. Nos. 215 & 327 of 2018
Decided On : 10-07-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. M H Hanil Kumar

IMPORTANT POINTS
The Notification issued by the Government of India in exercise of the power vested under Section 3(2)(ii) of the Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986, specifically enumerates the activities for which there is requirement of getting prior environmental clearance from the concerned Regulatory Authority. The list of projects or activities requiring such environmental clearance is scheduled in the Notification. Serial No.8 in the schedule deals with building or construction projects. It is specified that buildings which are having built area between the 20,000M2 and 1,50,000M2 alone need to get prior environmental clearance. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents had pointed out that, the Notification was amended through another Notification, dated 15.11.2018, wherein serial No. 8(a) of the schedule was amended to the extent of including building having built up area between 50,000M2 and 1,50,000M2.

Headnote:

Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015- Rule 14 (2) -The activity of digging of foundation for construction of a building is exempted from the requirement of getting prior environmental clearance- Rule 14 (2) of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 no quarrying permit is required for extraction of 'ordinary earth' in connection with the construction of residential buildings, including flats or commercial buildings having plinth area of 300M2, provided the land owner holds a valid building permit for such construction, issued by the local authority concerned.

Statement of facts

1)Rejecting his application seeking permission to remove the ordinary sand, for the purpose of construction of a building, for which he had obtained Ext.P1 building permit- 2)Seeking direction for disposal of his application for 'mining permit' for the purpose of extracting and transporting ordinary earth from the foundation of a building, without insisting for production of any 'Environmental Clearance Certificate', in view of the exemption contemplated under the Notification of the Central Government, because the building proposed is having plinth area of only less than 5000 M2.

Finding of the court:

The activity intended is, excavation of earth for the purpose of digging of foundation, which will also fall within the exempted category under item No.IX; “digging of foundations for building not requiring prior environmental clearance”-The buildings involved in these cases will fall under the exempted category as per item No.8(a) of the Schedule of the Notification. They will also fall within the exempted category under item No.IX of Appendix-IX. Hence we do not find any illegality or error with respect to the findings rendered by the learned Single Judge in directing consideration of the application for quarrying permit, without insisting upon production of any environmental clearance certificate.

Result: Dismissed

JUDGMENT :

ABDUL REHIM, J.

1. Since the issues agitated are identical in both these writ appeals and since the appellants in both the cases are the State Government and its officials in the Department of Mining and Geology, both the writ appeals are considered together and disposed of through this common judgment.

2. W.A. No.215/2018 arises out of the judgment in W.P (C) No.32834/2017. The respondent herein approached this court seeking to quash a proceedings issued by the 1st appellant, rejecting his application seeking permission to remove the ordinary sand, for the purpose of construction of a building, for which he had obtained Ext.P1 building permit. When the applications filed by him seeking for issuance of quarrying permit and transit passes were not considered by the 1st appellant, he approached this court on an earlier occasion in a writ petition, W.P (C) No.13289/2017. Through judgment dated 11-04-2017, this court directed the 1st appellant to consider and to pass orders on those applications, after hearing the writ petitioner, within three weeks, taking into consideration of the notifications issued by the Ministry of Forest, Environment and Climatic Changes, Government of India, dated 15-01-2016 and 19-12-2016. Consequent to the said judgment, the 1st appellant conducted personal hearing and a site inspection. He became convinced that there is no sand stored in the property. On the other hand, the writ petitioner submitted that, removal of sand to the extent of 10 feet depth is necessary for the construction. The 1st appellant rejected the application on the finding that, for allowing the applications the writ petitioner had to produce an 'Environmental Clearance Certificate' from the authority concerned, and also consent letters obtained from the neighbouring residents. It is the said order of the 1st appellant, produced as Ext.P13, was under challenge in the writ petition.

3. The learned Single Judge found that an activity of mining for the purpose of construction of building, is regulated under provisions of the Environment Protection Act and the Rules made thereunder, as well as under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act and the Rules made thereunder. It was noted that, through a Notification published by the Government of India, dated 14-09-2006 it is made clear that in projects involving building and construction upto an extent of 20,000 M2, it is not required to get prior environment clearance. By extracting provisions contained in Appendix IX (mistakenly noted as XI in the judgment) to the said notification, it was found that, the activity of digging of foundation for building, is exempted from the requirement of getting prior environmental clearance. Learned Single Judge found that, under Rule 14 (2) of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 (for short 'KMMC Rules') quarrying permit is not required for extraction of ordinary earth in connection with construction of any residential building, including flats or commercial buildings, having plinth area upto 300 M2, if a valid permit for the construction is obtained from the local self government authority. Therefore it was found that, in case of buildings having plinth area upto 300M2, no mining permit is required for the purpose of excavation in connection with foundation of the building, so long as the person holds a valid permit from the local authority. It was further found that, such persons need not obtain any 'Environmental Clearance Certificate' in view of the Notification of the Central Government, which grants exemption in that regard. Taking note of the facts involved, learned Single Judge found that, the writ petitioner possess Ext.P1 building permit and the proposed construction is having only a plinth area of 5336.48 M2. Therefore it was found that the writ petitioner is exempted from the requirement of obtaining prior environmental clearance. It was also found that, nevertheless he has to obtain a mining permit as a pre-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top