R.NARAYANA PISHARADI
Saneesh, S/o. Maniyan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
The revision petitioners are the accused in two different cases registered by the Abkari Officer for an offence punishable under Section 57(a) of the Abkari Act, 1077.
2. The common question that arises for consideration in these revision petitions is, whether an accused in a case registered under Section 57(a) of the Abkari Act for adulteration of toddy, is entitled to get the second sample of toddy sent for chemical analysis and if so, at what stage of the case, he can exercise that right.
3. In both cases under consideration here, the excise officials took two samples of toddy from the toddy shops conducted by the petitioners. The first sample was sent by the excise officials for chemical analysis. The result of the chemical analysis was that the first sample contained adulterant in it. On the basis of such positive report, cases were registered against the petitioners under Section 57(a) of the Abkari Act.
4. Before filing final report in the court by the Abkari Officer, the petitioners filed applications before the court below for sending the second sample for chemical analysis. Learned Magistrate dismissed the applications filed by them. The aforesaid orders are challenge
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.