SUNIL THOMAS
Sreelakshmi Kuries and Loans Pvt. Ltd. Koppam, Palakkad Represented By Its Manager Sri. M. Haridasan – Appellant
Versus
Vijeesh V. M. S/o Viswanathan Nair – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The complainant in ST No. 1274/2005 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-1 Palakkad, aggrieved by the acquittal of the accused under section 255(1) of Cr.P.C. for offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, has preferred this appeal.
2. The case of the complainant was that, they were conducting a kuri, from the Kozhikode Branch, in which the accused had subscribed a chitty for Rs.1,00,000/-. He bid the chitty for Rs.50,000/-and received the amount on execution of necessary documents. He thereafter failed to remit the future installments. Towards the discharge of the existing liability, the accused executed and delivered to the complainant a cheque for a sum of Rs.47,500/-drawn on his account. The cheque was presented for collection but was returned dishonoured. Statutory notice was issued, which was neither replied nor the amount paid. Hence, the complaint was laid alleging commission of offence punishable under section 138 of the NI Act.
3. Before the court below, the accused appeared and pleaded innocence. On the side of the complainant, his power of attorney holder was examined as PW1 . Exts.P1 to P8 were marked. There was no defence evid
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.