SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Ker) 159

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. ASHA, J.
Santhosh.N.C. S/o Late Chandrasekharan Nair and Ors - Appellants
Versus
Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd. Represented by its secretary and Ors - Respondent
W.P(C) Nos.6410 of 2019-A, 6723 of 2019-M and W.P(c).No.6922 of 2019-M
Decided On : 24-01-2020

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Sri.P.Ravindran (sr.), Smt.Aparna Rajan, Sri.Sreedhar Ravindran
For the Respondent: Sri.C.Joseph Antony, Sri.Georgekutty Mathew, SC, KSEB, Sri Sunil Kuriakose, Sri.M.C.Mony, CGC, Sri.N.Krishna Prasad, Sri.V.Venugopalan Nair

IMPORTANT POINTS
What is under challenge in these Writ Petitions is the vires of Regulation 116. If at all the Government found that there were difficulties to comply with the Regulations or the provisions in the scheme or agreement stood in the way of implementation, the State Government could have brought the same to the notice of the Authority when it was consulted before framing the Regulations.

Headnote:

Central Electricity Authority (Measures relating to Safety and Electric Supply) Regulations, 2010- Regulations 6 and 7 -The State Government has granted not only deviation but total exemption from the applicability of Regulations 6 and 7, not only to the employees who were in service as on the date of enforcement of Regulations 2010, but to all those who were in service as on the date of Ext.P4 order. The respondents cannot sustain Ext.P4 under the guise of policy decision also, over and above the provisions in the Regulations.

Statement of facts:

Order issued by the Government (produced as Ext.P4 in W.P.(C). 6410 of 2019) exempting the existing employees of Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd. from the qualifications prescribed in Regulations 6 and 7 of the Central Electricity Authority (Measures relating to Safety and Electric Supply) Regulations, 2010 purportedly under Regulation 116 of the Regulations is under challenge in these Writ Petitions filed by Sub Engineers/Overseers/Linemen. As the issue involved is common, all these Writ Petitions are disposed of by this common judgment.

Finding of the court:

Regulation 116 to the extent it permits Government to make deviations from the Regulations is beyond the legislative power conferred on the Electricity Authority under the Electricity Act, 2003. It is so declared. Ext.P4 order stated to have been issued under Regulation 116, but goes even beyond deviation and what is permitted under the said Regulation is also therefore unsustainable. There shall also be a direction to the respondent KSEBL to effect promotions in accordance with the provisions contained in Regulations 6 and 7 of the CEA Regulations, 2010.

Result: Writ petitions are allowed accordingly.

JUDGMENT :

1. Order issued by the Government (produced as Ext.P4 in W.P.(C). 6410 of 2019) exempting the existing employees of Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd. from the qualifications prescribed in Regulations 6 and 7 of the Central Electricity Authority (Measures relating to Safety and Electric Supply) Regulations, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as `Regulations' for short), purportedly under Regulation 116 of the Regulations is under challenge in these Writ Petitions filed by Sub Engineers/Overseers/Linemen. As the issue involved is common, all these Writ Petitions are disposed of by this common judgment. The parties and documents referred to in this judgment are as described in W.P.(C) No.6410/2019 unless specified otherwise.

2. English translation of the operative portion of Ext.P4 order is the following:

    “Government examined the same, taking note of the importance of the Regulations, the right of the employees to enjoy the service benefits and promotional avenues based on long term settlements and found that any alteration of the service conditions would adversely affect the efficiency and smooth functioning of the KSEBL. The experience gained in the electricity wing is sufficient to perform the duties attached to each post effectively. Considering the above aspects, Government, in exercise of its powers under Regulation 116 of the Regulations 2010, hereby orders that the promotion of the existing employees would continue to be governed by the existing provisions, effecting deviation, in relaxation of Regulations 6 and 7.”

The contention of the petitioners is that the Government does not have any authority to issue such an order. They are also challenging Regulation 116 to the extent it permits the State Government/Central Government to issue orders deviating from the provisions contained in the Regulations. According to them, the said provision is ultravires the provisions contained in the Electricity Act, 2003, as the same does not contain any provisions enabling the Central Electricity Authority to frame a regulation permitting the Governments to grant exemptions. The Central Electricity Authority is not empowered to delegate its functions to the Government in the absence of any enabling provisions. The petitioners point out that the reason for issuing Ext.P4 order is a representation received from a trade union, as evident from Ext.P5. It is pointed out that the authority is framing regulations after consultation with all stake holders.

3. Respondents 1 and 2 have filed a counter affidavit supporting Ext.P4 order passed by the Government. It is stated that all the functions, assets, liabilities, rights and obligations of the erstwhile Kerala State Electricity Board were vested in the State Government as per notification dated 25.09.2008 of the State Government, in exercise of its powers under Section 131 of the Act. Thereafter, all those were revested in the Kerala State Electricity Board Limited, as a Public Limited Company, based on Second Transfer Scheme (revesting) 2013 as per Ext.R2(a) scheme dated 31.10.2013 and KSEBL started its operations on 01.11.2013. According to them, the provisions in Regulations 6(3) and 7 (3) providing for training to be given to the existing employees is consistent with Section 133(2) of the Act and the Regulations can only be subservient to the Act. It is also stated that the Central or State Government can allow deviations in matters referred in the regulations. It is stated that in the light of Sections 53 and 177(2)(b), the Authority has to consult the State Government while specifying measures relating to safety and electrical supply. It is stated that Ext.R2(b) tripartite agreement was executed between the KSEBL, its employees and the Government of Kerala on 01.08.2014 in accordance with clause 6(8) of Ext.R2(a) scheme; as per clause 2(c) of that agreement, the terms and conditions of services of existing employees such as promotions, transfers, wages, compensations, leave, allowanc

                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        6
                        7
                        8
                        9
                        10
                        11
                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                        supreme today icon
                        logo-black

                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                        Please visit our Training & Support
                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                        qr

                        Scan Me!

                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                        whatsapp-icon Back to top