SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Ker) 283

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S. Manikumar, C.K. Abdul Rehim, Justice C.T. Ravikumar, JJ.
Suo Motu
W.P.(C) No. 9400 of 2020
Decided on : 25-03-2020

IMPORTANT POINTS
Right of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India should not, at any rate, be infringed by arresting an accused, except in matters where arrest is inevitable. However, the State is at liberty to take appropriate decision in respect of heinous/serious offences and in rest of the cases, State may act accordingly.

Headnote:

Constitution of India-Art. 21, Art.226--Suo Moto- Order dated 25.3.2020 and 30.3.2020-For the consideration of extremely urgent cases already filed or to be filed before this court, including bail applications, the Hon'ble Chief Justice had constituted a Division Bench comprising of two Hon'ble Judges of this court. Necessary instructions have been issued by the Registry for dealing with such cases through e-filing and through Video-conferencing. The sitting of the Division Bench in this court for considering such matters will continue during the period of lock down on the basis of those instructions.

Statement of facts:

Suo Moto- Order dated 25.3.2020 and 30.3.2020 - With the consent of all concerned, interim order granted in respect of orders passed by Courts/ Tribunals upon which High Court exercises supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, which are due to expire during the lock down period, are extended till 30.6.2020. However, as stated supra, the aggrieved party is at liberty to move for vacating such orders before the appropriate Courts/Tribunals, as the case may be.

Finding of the court:

As per clause (v) of order dated 30.3.2020, time granted for prisoners released on interim bail to appear before the jurisdictional Court is within three days from 30.4.2020 or till the end of the lock down period. The lock down period is extended up to 31.5.2020. Considering the rush in filing the bail applications of those persons released on interim bail, we deem it fit to extend the period to seven days and the prisoners to appear and file bail applications before the concerned jurisdictional courts within seven days from the end of the lock down period.

Result: Order dated 25.3.2020 and 30.3.2020 are modified as indicated above.

ORDER

1. On 25.3.2020, a Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court, after considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, at paragraph Nos. 4 and 5, passed the following order:

    “4. We are informed that the High Court as well as the Courts in the District Judiciary and Tribunals have granted interim orders for a limited period and inasmuch as the litigants, their respective counsel, will not be in a position to approach the Courts/Tribunals for filing an application for extension, during this total lock down period of 21 days, necessary orders have to be issued, so as to enable the litigants not to suffer on account of their inability to approach the Courts in the Districts/Tribunals, as the case may be. Therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, all the interim orders passed by all the Courts/Tribunals upon which High Court exercises supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, which are due to expire during the lock down period of 21 days, are extended by this Court by one month from today.

5. We also make it clear that, if any application is filed for extending/vacating an interim order and pending for orders in this Court, the interim orders will be extended for one month.”

2. Subsequently, another Full Bench of this Court on 30.3.2020 at paragraph 8, passed the following order:

    “8. Before parting with, it is made clear that the extension granted to the interim orders, through order of this court dated 25-03-2020 will stand further extended upto 18-05- 2020, the date of re-opening of the courts after mid-summer vacation. However the aggrieved party will be at liberty to move for vacating such orders, before the appropriate court. All other directions contained in the order of this court dated 25-03-2020, will continue to be in force.”

3. On this day, when the matter came up for hearing, we heard Mr. Ranjith Thampan, learned Additional Advocate General, Mr. Jaishankar V. Nair on behalf of learned Assistant Solicitor General, representing the Government of India and Public Sector undertakings owned and controlled by the Government of India, and Mr. R. Lakshmi Narayan on behalf of the Kerala High Court Advocates' Association.

4. With the consent of all concerned, interim order granted in respect of orders passed by Courts/ Tribunals upon which High Court exercises supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, which are due to expire during the lock down period, are extended till 30.6.2020. However, as stated supra, the aggrieved party is at liberty to move for vacating such orders before the appropriate Courts/Tribunals, as the case may be.

5. Insofar as recovery proceedings under State Laws are concerned, taking note of the submissions of Mr. Ranjith Thampan, learned Additional Advocate General, Government of Kerala, on 25.3.2020 at paragraph No.6, we recorded the submission as hereunder:

    “6. In so far as recovery proceedings under the State Laws are concerned, Shri Ranjith Thampan, learned Additional Advocate General submitted that, in all recovery matters, such as electricity, water, Abkari and other matters, Council of Ministers, Government of Kerala has already taken a decision that payment will be deferred upto 30.04.2020, and therefore, no recovery proceedings would be initiated or recovery proceedings already initiated, would not be proceeded further until 30.04.2020. The submission of the learned Additional Advocate General is placed on record.”

Thereafter, at paragraph 23, we passed the following order:

    “23. Shri Ranjith Thampan, learned Additional Advocate General also submitted that, in so far as Local Self Government Institutions are concerned, Government have issued instructions not to take any coercive action. It is sincerely expected that, due to the outbreak of COVID-19, State Government, LSG Institutions, Government of India, and Public Sector Undertakings owned and controlled by the State/Central Governments that no coercive action be taken since there i

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top