JUDGMENT :

Bechu Kurian Thomas, J.

The scope of protection which a transferee pendente lite can seek from an executing court arises for consideration. The transferees pendente lite challenge the dismissal of their petition filed under Order 21 Rule 99 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, (for brevity 'CPC').

2. Petitioners are transferees pendente lite. They had purchased 4.86 ares of property by Sale Deed No.1149/10 dated 8.7.2010 of the SRO Kadakkavur from respondents 3 and 4. Transferors of the petitioners are respondents 3 and 4, who had purchased the property from the 2nd respondent as per Sale Deed No.731/2008. According to the petitioners, it was only in 2015, that they came to know that the 1st respondent had secured sale certificate in E.P. No.23 of 2013, with respect to the scheduled property and even though, 1st respondent had legally ousted respondents 2 to 4, petitioners continued in physical possession and an application was filed as E.A. 100 of 2015 in E.P. No.23 of 2013 in O.P. No.1350 of 2008 under Order 21 Rule 99 CPC, to reconvey their rights and possession. However, by Ext. P8 order, the application was dismissed. This Original Petition is preferred against Ext.P8