A.HARIPRASAD, M.R.ANITHA
Manikandan, S/o Nanu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.R. Anitha, J.
1. Appellants are accused Nos.1 to 3, 5 and 7 in S.C.No.315/2008 on the files of Additional Sessions Court-II, Palakkad.
2. Prosecution case is that accused 1 to 7 hatched a criminal conspiracy in the evening of 29.10.2007 at BJP party office near Nilampathi bridge at Kadukkamkunnam to do away with the deceased Gopalakrishnan and Raveendran out of previous enmity and political feud. For that they formed themselves into an unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly rioted with deadly weapons. They got information of the deceased persons attending the marriage party of PW16 Radhakrishnan and 4th accused directed the 6th accused to wait near Mukkei temple to inform the other accused about the movements of deceased persons over phone. As agreed, 6th accused intimated, the deceased persons coming out of the marriage reception on KL-09L/1972 motorcycle through Nilampathy bridge. Accordingly when the deceased were coming on the motorcycle and reached near the pillar on the northern side of Nilampathy bridge at about 6.45 p.m, accused persons in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, wrongfully rest
Balwan Singh v. State of Chathisgarh (2019 7 SCC 781)
Dudhnath Pandey v. State of U.P. (AIR 1981 SC 911)
Golden Satheesan@Satheesan and others V State of Kerala (2012 KHC 25)
Hari Singh and Anr. v. State of M.P. [2019 (8) SCC 677 : 2019 KHC 6947]
Maruti Rama Naik v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 10 SCC 670)
Mohan Singh and others v. State of Punjab (1981 KHC 735 : AIR 1981 SC 1578)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.