IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S. MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P. CHALY, JJ.
Jaffer Khan S/o Oukkar Haji – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Rep. by Secretary Ministry of Road Transport and Highways – Respondent
W.P. (C) Nos. 20500, 20768 of 2020
Decided On : 23-11-2020
Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989- Rule 151A- Introduction of Rule 151A - The Central Government through various notifications under this scheme, had granted wide and ample powers to the State Governments, to formulate policies and to effectively and efficiently implement the scheme-Installation of VLTDs in educational institution buses and vehicles carrying school children -
Statement of facts:
The petitioner claims to be an Advisory Committee member of RAF (Road Accident Forum), for the State of Kerala. He is also a Human Rights Protection activist and was earlier president of Perumani Muslim Jamath Committee. Aggrieved by the non implementation of Government order dated 28.11.2016 and subsequent orders, he has approached this Court.
Finding of the court:
The object of framing Rule 151A of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, safety of the commuters, in particular, women and children, and taking note of the periodical orders issued by the Government of Kerala, a duty is cast upon them to implement the rule and the notifications, without any further delay. As regards enforcement of the rules, notifications and circular, the difficulty expressed by the Government with respect to the vehicles coming from other States, exempting the above said vehicles, is just and reasonable
Result: Writ Petitions disposed of
JUDGMENT :
S. MANIKUMAR, J.
1. W.P. (C) No. 20500 of 2020 is filed for the following reliefs:
(ii) To direct the 3rd respondent - The Transport Commissioner, Trivandrum, or its subordinate officers to have strict checking in the matter with regard to the implementation of Exhibit-P3 notification dated 28.11.2019 and not to grant any exemption to any category of vehicle, as it would go against the scheme and objective of the scheme.
2. W.P. (C) No. 20768 of 2020 is filed for the following reliefs:
(ii) Direct respondents 2 to 4 not to allow any vehicles within the State, which is not equipped and fitted with vehicle location tracking devices.
(iii) Direct the respondents not to issue or renew fitness certificates to any vehicles in the State, which are not equipped or fitted with VLT devices and emergency buttons.
3. As both the writ petitions are filed for strict implementation of Vehicle Location Tracking Devices (VLTDs) in the motor vehicles, they are taken up together and disposed of by a common judgment.
4. Facts leading to the filing of W.P. (C) No. 20500 of 2020 are that the petitioner claims to be an Advisory Committee member of RAF (Road Accident Forum), for the State of Kerala. He is also a Human Rights Protection activist and was earlier president of Perumani Muslim Jamath Committee. Aggrieved by the non implementation of Government order dated 28.11.2016 and subsequent orders, he has approached this Court.
5. Petitioner has further stated that vide Exhibit-P1 notification dated 28.11.2016, amendment was made in the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, by incorporating Rule 125H, which mandates installation of VLTD and emergency button. As per the said notification, the statute comes into force with effect from 01.04.2018. Thereafter, through Exhibit-P2 notification dated 25.10.2018, Central Government has exempted all the vehicles from fitting VLTDs and emergency buttons till 31st December, 2018. Power was given to the Government of the State and Union territories to notify the date of compliance of requirement.
6. Petitioner has further stated that in exercise of the powers conferred, State Government has issued Exhibit-P3 notification dated 28.11.2019, making 6 categories of public service vehicles to fix VLTDs and emergency buttons and also prescribed the time period, for each category of vehicles for installing tracking system and emergency buttons. The maximum time period fixed is now over. That being the situation, State Government have issued notification dated 17.02.2020 (Exhibit-P4), wherein again, extension was granted to KSRTC and stage carriages, and the reasons for such extension has been mentioned in the explanatory note.
7. Petitioner has further stated that in the year 2014, the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs has approved a scheme for enhancing the security for women in public road transport in the country. The objective of the scheme is to provide safe and secure public transport to the people of the country, particularly women and girl children, in the context of the “Nirbhaya case.” With a vie
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.