V.G.ARUN
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Sunil N. S. @ Pulsar Suni – Respondent
ORDER :
The Special Public Prosecutor appointed by the State and the de facto complainant/victim in S.C.No.118 of 2018 pending on the files of the Additional Special Judge (SPE/CBI)-III, Ernakulam, seek transfer of the case to another court, on the apprehension that the Special Judge before whom the trial is being conducted is biased against the prosecution.
2. The case originated from a complaint filed by the victim, a film actor of repute, stating that, while travelling from Thrissur to Ernakulam on 17.2.2017, she was abducted and subjected to sexual assault, and that the sexually explicit act was recorded. This resulted in Crime No. 297 of 2017 being registered at the Nedumbassery Police Station. After the investigation, the final report was filed alleging commission of offences under Sections 120A, 120B, 109, 342, 366, 354, 354B, 356, 376D, 506(1), 201, 212 read with 34 of the IPC and Sections 66E and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The gist of the findings in the final report is that the crime was committed at the instance of the 8th accused, another film actor, pursuant to a conspiracy hatched by him with the other accused.
3. After completion of necessary formaliti
Abdul Nazar Madani v. State of Tamil Nadu [(2000) 6 SCC 204]
K.Anbazhagan v. Superintendent of Police [(2004) 3 SCC 767]
Mina Lalita Baruwa v. State of Orissa [(2013) 16 SCC 173]
Manak Lal v. Dr Prem Chand Singhvi
Maneka Sanjay Gandhi v. Rani Jethmalani [(1979) 4 SCC 167]
Nirmal Singh Kahlon v. State of Punjab [(2009) 1 SCC 441]
Satish Jaggi v. State of Chhattisgarh [(2007) 3 SCC 62]
State of West Bengal v. Shivananda Pathak [(1998) 5 SCC 513]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.