RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V.
Mary – Appellant
Versus
Sub Registrar, O/O. The Sub-Registrar, Irinjalakuda – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sri. Brijith, the brother-in-law of the petitioner herein, is a Canadian citizen. His father died intestate living behind various items of properties. Brijith decided to relinquish his rights in favour of the other legal heirs and, to effectuate his desire, executed a power of attorney authorising the petitioner to execute a release deed. The notarized power of attorney was attested by the Vice-Consul, Consulate General of India, Toronto.
2. The Power of Attorney was presented before the 2nd respondent for adjudication under Chapter III of the Kerala Stamp Act, 1959. The 2nd respondent, exercising power under Section 32(1)(b) of the Stamp Act, directed the petitioner to remit a sum of Rs.17,440/- being the amount chargeable under Schedule 1 Article 44 (f) of the Stamp Act. The petitioner duly remitted the amount, and the 2nd respondent made the endorsement in the document.
3. As per Section 17 (g) of the Registration Act, 1908, a Power of attorney which creates any power or right of management, administration, development, transfer or any other transaction relating to immovable property of the value of one hundred rupees and upwards other than those executed in favour of fa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.