IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SHIRCY V., J.
AKHILESH S/O.VISWAMBHARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondents
Crl.MC.No.185 OF 2021(C)
Decided On : 01-03-2021
Passport - Criminal Case - Section 377 of Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act - Sections 5 and 6 of the Passports Act, 1967 - G.S.R. 570(E) notification - Court directs petitioner to approach the court concerned for appropriate orders
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, accused in a criminal case, sought a passport for academic purposes. The court directed the petitioner to approach the court concerned for appropriate orders.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the decision regarding the petitioner's entitlement to a passport and the period for which he is entitled to hold the passport should be decided by the court concerned where the case is pending.
Issues: Entitlement to passport despite pending criminal case, decision to be made by the court concerned, factors to be considered by the court
Ratio Decidendi: The court concerned where the case is pending has the authority to decide the petitioner's entitlement to a passport, considering factors such as the stage of investigation or trial, necessity for foreign travel, and potential difficulties caused by refusal.
Final Decision: The petitioner was directed to approach the court concerned with a proper application for appropriate orders. The court below was instructed to dispose of the application within three weeks.
ORDER :
1. Dated this the 1st day of March 2021 The petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 865 of 2016 of Mannar Police Station, Alappuzha District registered for the offences punishable under Section 377 of Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.
2. This application is filed seeking the following reliefs:
i) direct the 3rd respondent to consider petitioner's application wide Ref. No.21-1000132233 and issue passport to the petitioner immediately for a period of two years.
ii) issue such other order or direction, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. Bail has been granted to the petitioner as per an order dated 30.08.2016 by this Court. It is the case of the petitioner that he has no criminal antecedents and he has not committed any offence as alleged. Now he has joined a professional course at Marina Academy of Maritime Training Centre, Ahmedabad and to pursue the studies he has to submit a copy of his passport to the Training Centre. As part of his academic course, it is necessary to travel in ships in and outside the country and therefore, he has submitted an application before the Passport Seva Kendra at Chengannur under the 3rd respondent for passport to facilitate his studies. Pursuant to the same, he was directed to appear before the Passport Seva Kendra on 25.01.2021 at 9.30 a.m. As the passport authority will issue passport only with the permission of the court because of the case pending against him he has come up with this application.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Section 5 of the passports Act 1967 deal with the applications and power of the authority to issue passports. The relevant part of the section applicable to the present case reads as follows:
(1) xxxx xxxx
(2) On receipt of an application under this section, the passport authority, after making such inquiry, if any, as it may consider necessary, shall, subject to the other provisions of this Act, by order in writing,-
(a) issue the passport or travel document with endorsement, or, as the case may be, make on the passport or travel document the endorsement, in respect of the foreign country or countries specified in the application; or
(b) issue the passport or travel document with endorsement, or, as the case may be, make on the passport or travel document the endorsement, in respect of one or more of the foreign countries specified in the application and refuse to make an endorsement in respect of the other country or countries; or
(c) refuse to issue the passport or travel document, or, as the case may be, refuse to make on the passport or travel document any endorsement."
6. Section 6 of the Act deals with refusal of passports, travel documents etc. Sub Section (2)(f) says that the authority can refuse to issue passport to a person if a criminal case is pending before a criminal court in India.
Sub section (2)(f) of Section 6 of the Passport Act,967 is extracted hereunder:
(1) xxxx xxxx
(2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the passport authority shall refuse to issue a passport or travel document for visiting any foreign country under clause (c) or sub-section (2) of
(f) that proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant are pending before a Criminal Court in India.”
section 5 on any one or more of the following
grounds, and on no other namely:-
(a) to (e) xxxx xxxx
7. At this juncture it is necessary to set out the notification issued by the Government of India dated 25.8.1993 regarding the guidelines to the authority to issue passport to citizens of India against whom proceedings are pending in criminal cases. It reads as follows:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.