IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SHIRCY V., J.
Althaf S/o. Ajaib - Petitioner
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala & Ors. - Respondents
Bail Appl. No.1799 of 2021
Decided On : 31-03-2021
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 406 and 420 – Cheating - Dishonestly withdrawal of amount – Bail Application – Petitioner is the accused in Crime registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code – Prosecution allegation is that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are friends. He got acquaintance with her through 'Instagram'. – He then with the intention to cheat the defacto complainant, received 6 sovereigns of gold ornaments from her and also her ATM card. – Then he dishonestly withdrew an amount of Rs.15,000 from her account and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.
Finding of the Court : Gold ornaments were received by him with the intention to cheat the defacto complainant and hence recovery had been effected subsequently from a shop, where he had sold the gold ornaments. – Now the investigation of the case is well in progress.–Considering the period of detention undergone by the petitioner in custody as well the present stage of the investigation, Court is inclined to release him on bail subject to the conditions.
Result : Bail allowed.
ORDER :
Application for regular bail.
The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.371/2021 of Varkala Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioner has been in custody since 08.02.2021.
3. The prosecution allegation is that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are friends. He got acquaintance with her through 'Instagram'. He then with the intention to cheat the defacto complainant, received 6 sovereigns of gold ornaments from her and also her ATM card. Then he dishonestly withdrew an amount of Rs.15,000 from her account and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a young boy aged only 21 years. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. But in fact, the defacto complainant has handed over her gold ornaments so as to pledge the same and collected money for her to purchase luxurious items such as camera, costly dress and other things. But he has never received her gold ornaments with the intention to cheat her. But he is undergoing incarceration for the last more than 50 days, hence this application.
5. According to the learned Public Prosecutor the gold ornaments were received by him with the intention to cheat the defacto complainant and hence recovery had been effected subsequently from a shop, where he had sold the gold ornaments. Now the investigation of the case is well in progress.
6. Considering the period of detention undergone by the petitioner in custody as well the present stage of the investigation, I am inclined to release him on bail subject to the following conditions:
(ii) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation as and when required by him, in writing.
(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.