SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ker) 256

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, C.S.DIAS
Shiju Joy – Appellant
Versus
Nisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: A.X. Varghese, Kaleeswaram Raj, A.V. Jojo, Rajesh Sivaramankutty, K. Vijina, Arul Muralidharan, Jaeona James, V.G. Arun, Neeraj Narayan, R. Harikrishnan (Kambisseril), N. Raphy Raj, V. Jaya Ragi, Naveen Radhakrishnan, K.V. Anil Kumar, R.S. Kalkura, Harish Gopinath, M.S. Kalesh, P.S. Appu, S.R. Aneesh, Santhan V. Nair, Christeena P. George, K.V. Anil Kumar, C. Rajendran, B.N. Haskar, Maitreyi Sachidananda Hegde, Thulasi K. Raj, A. Aruna, Varun C. Vijay, Mini Gangadharan, Aswathi S. Kumar, Abraham Samson, Lovely Samson, P.R. Jayakrishnan, R. Reji Kumar, K. Venugopalan Nair, Nirmal V. Nair, G. Akhil Alphonse, Parvathy S. Krishnan, P. Mithun, M. Sreekumar, P. Anjana, Dinesh Mathew J.Muricken, T.N. Manoj, J.G. Syamnath, G. Sreekumar (Chelur), Gyothish Chandran, Binitha James, S. Rekha Kumari, S.Abhilash, R.V. Sreejith, G. Maheswary, Abraham Mathew (Vettoor) & Anil Abey Jose
For the Respondents: V.C. Rajesh, K.J. Gladis, A.K. Arun Chandran, Aparna Sukumaran, Alexander George, V.K. Balachandran, Drishya K. Prakash, R. Muraleekrishnan (Malakkara), K. Siju, M. Anilprasad, Anjana Kannath, S.Seetha, Manoj Ramaswamy, S. Sumeen, J.R. Prem Navaz, R. Sudhish & M. Manju

JUDGMENT :

A. Muhamed Mustaque & C.S. Dias, JJ.

1. We are, in this batch of Original Petitions, asked to resolve the difficulties caused to the litigants due to the inordinate delay in disposal of cases by the Family Courts in the State. These Original Petitions speak about the various hurdles faced by the parties in resolving their matrimonial disputes. The petitioners who are parties to different proceedings, have invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Art.227 of the Constitution and sought for directions to the Family Courts to expeditiously dispose of pending proceedings. It was a routine practice in this Court to call for reports from the Family Courts and issue directions to dispose of proceedings in a time bound manner. This has caused perceived injustice to many, as those who approach this Court stand in advantageous position in getting their cases disposed of on a priority basis. The delay involved in disposal of cases before the Family Courts cannot be signified for a singular reason. The problems faced are multifaceted and are of different dimensions. Lack of infrastructure, docket explosion, untrained officers and staff, inept case management etc., are a

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top