SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ker) 290

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.
T. Joseph S/o Thomas – Petitioner
Versus
The Circle Inspector of Police, Peerumedu Police Station – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 5986 of 2021
Decided On : 13-04-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. Sanil Kumar.
For the Respondents: Sri. Neeraj Sunil, Sri. U.K. Devidas, Smt. P.M. Shahida, Sri. Shyamlal S.

Point of Law: Construction of Slab - Adequate police protection to build slab for using pathway.

Headnote:

Civil Laws - Police Protection - writ petition is filed for directing police authorities to provide adequate and effective police protection to life and property of petitioner for purpose of building a slab for his ingress and egress to his house.

Finding of the Court:

Third respondent submits that they are not obstructing building of slab for using pathway - Construction of slab for using pathway shall not lead to flooding their premises - Accordingly, there will be a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to afford adequate protection to petitioner to build slab for using pathway - Construction shall be carried out in presence of officials of concerned Panchayath.

Result: Writ Petition Disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.

1. The above writ petition is filed for directing the police authorities to provide adequate and effective police protection to the life and property of the petitioner for the purpose of building a slab for his ingress and egress to his house.

2. The first respondent, Station House Officer, has filed a statement and paragraph 5 of the statement is extracted below:-

“5. The petitioner can be allowed to build a said slab for using this pathway conveniently abiding to the existing laws so that he can use the pathway in rainy season. Police will provide adequate Assistance, for the construction and installation of the slab, if required.”

3. The third respondent submits that they are not obstructing the building of the slab for using the pathway. However, the construction of the slab for using the pathway shall not lead to flooding their premises. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to afford adequate protection to the petitioner to build slab for using the pathway. However, the construction shall be carried out in the presence of the officials of the concerned Panchayath.

4. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top