IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, M.R.ANITHA, JJ.
NOORUDHEEN.V., - APPELLANT
Versus
MUHAMMED NAJMAL, S/O.KUNHAMMED KUTTY - RESPONDENT
RFA NO. 295 OF 2019
Decided On : 06-07-2021
Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1959 - Section 69A - Code of Civil Procedure,1908 - Section 89 - Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1955 - Section 69A - Suit for recovery of an amount - Execution of decree - Furnish sufficient security for the decree amount and cost - parties is compromised - Appellant is the defendant in file of Subordinate Judge’s Court, Kozhikode - Respondent-plaintiff filed said suit for recovery of an amount - Together with interest at rate judgment trial court decreed the suit and the defendant was held liable to pay an amount - Interest from the date of suit to the date of decree and thereafter, 6% interest till - Defendants, both movable and immovable - Court admitted the matter on file and issued notice to the respondent-plaintiff - Court granted an interim order staying the execution of decree –
Finding of the Court: Apex Court in that decision shall apply with equal force regarding refund of court fee under the Kerala Act and therefore, Section 89 of Code of Civil Procedure shall cover, and the benefit of Section 69A of the Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act shall also extend to all methods of out-of-court dispute settlement between parties - private negotiations and settlements between the parties, court subsequently finds to have been legally arrived - Section 69A of the Kerala Act - court fee shall be ordered in interlocutory matters - Appellant-defendant is entitled for refund of court fee paid before this Court in this appeal –
Result: Appeal is disposed of
JUDGMENT :
Anil K.Narendran, J.
1. The appellant is the defendant in O.S.No.111 of 2017 on the file of the Subordinate Judge’s Court, Kozhikode. The respondent-plaintiff filed the said suit for recovery of an amount of Rs.74,20,200/-from the defendant, together with interest at the rate of 12%. By the judgment dated 16.03.2019, the trial court decreed the suit and the defendant was held liable to pay an amount of Rs.83,10,400/-with 12% interest from the date of suit to the date of decree and thereafter, 6% interest till realisation. As per the decree, the plaintiff is entitled to realise the said amount from the assets of the defendants, both movable and immovable. The defendant was held liable to pay cost to the plaintiff. Challenging the judgment and decree of the trial court, the appellant-defendant is before this Court in this appeal.
2. On 05.07.2019, when this appeal came up for admission, this Court admitted the matter on file and issued notice to the respondent-plaintiff. This Court granted an interim order in I.A.No.1 of 2019, staying the execution of the decree, for a period of three months, on the condition that the appellant shall furnish sufficient security for the decree amount and cost, within one month from the date of order.
3. On 04.10.2019, when this appeal came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the condition stipulated in the order dated 05.07.2019 had been complied with. Recording the said submission, this Court extended the interim order for a further period of six months.
4. On 18.06.2021, the appellant has filed I.A.No.1 of 2021, an application under Order XXIII, Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to record the settlement arrived at between the parties, as evidenced by Annexure A joint statement dated 29.04.2021.
5. Condition Nos.3 and 4 of Annexure A joint statement dated 29.04.2021 read thus;
4. Out of the balance amount of Rs.25,00,000/-, the defendant will pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-within 21 days from today. The balance sum of Rs.20,00,000/-will be paid on or before 30.06.2021 without any default from the side of the defendant.”
6. On 28.06.2021, when this appeal came up for consideration, the matter was adjourned to this date for further consideration.
7. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant-defendant and also the learned counsel for the respondent-plaintiff.
8. The learned counsel for the respondent-plaintiff would submit that the appellant-defendant had complied with condition No.4 in Annexure A joint statement dated 29.04.2021 by paying the balance sum of Rs.20,00,000/-to the respondent-plaintiff, on 30.06.2021. The said submission is recorded.
9. The learned counsel for the appellant would point out condition No.6 in Annexure A joint statement dated 29.04.2021, which deals with refund of court fee, which reads thus;
10. Section 69A of the Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1959, which deals with refund of court fee in case where the dispute is settled under Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, reads thus;
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.