K.VINOD CHANDRAN, ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
Madhu, S/o Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by the Inspector of Police, Pandikkad, Through The Public Prosecutor – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vinod Chandran, J.
When a man abandons his wife and children, roving vultures wait to prey on not only the abandoned woman, but also the helpless children. In this case we have a 'poojari'/'komaram' (priest/oracle in a temple) taking the abandoned woman and the three children under his wing, only to repeatedly molest the elder girl child, that too in the presence of her siblings. We wonder which God would accept the obeisance and offerings of such a priest or make him a medium?
2. We have heard learned Counsel Sri. K.M.Firoz for the appellant/accused and Smt.Sheeba Thomas, learned Public Prosecutor for the State.
3. Sri.Firoz took us through the charge to point out that there is a misjoinder of charges. The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 ['POCSO Act' for brevity] was brought into effect from 14.11.2012 and the incident on which the first charge is levelled is prior to the POCSO Act and requires a committal proceeding under the Cr.P.C. This is unlike the later allegation, which raises a charge under the POCSO Act, where the Special Court could take cognizance of it under Section 33 of the POCSO Act. It is also pointed out that clubbing of the charges ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.