K.VINOD CHANDRAN, ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
Gokul Raj, S/o. Rajan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam – Respondent
ORDER :
K. Vinod Chandran, J.
The above case is placed before us on a reference made by a learned Single Judge of this Court. A Division Bench of this Court in Basheer K. v. C.K. Usman Koya [2021 (2) KHC 432 (DB)] held that a reference by a learned Single Judge is not of a question, but the case itself. In such circumstances, we heard the issue, which was the subject of reference and the case on merits.
2. Sri. Nireesh Mathew, learned Counsel, appeared for the petitioner and Sri. S.U. Nazar, learned Public Prosecutor, appeared for the State. Respondents 2 & 4 were represented by the respective Standing Counsel.
3. On facts, the petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No.5 of 2020 of Attingal Excise Circle Office, pending before the Additional Sessions Court-I, Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner filed an application as produced at Annexure-A, seeking directions to respondents 2 & 4 to produce the details regarding the name of the subscriber and the tower location of two mobile numbers respectively said to be used by Circle Inspectors of Excise, Attingal, Varkala and Excise Range Inspector of Kilimanoor. From the 4th respondent, details were sought of the mobile used by the petitioner. Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.