SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ker) 733

A.BADHARUDEEN
Aneesh – Appellant
Versus
Aneena – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: G.P.Shinod, Sri.Govind Padmanaabhan, Shri.Ajit G Anjarlekar, Advs.
For the Respondent: G.S.Reghunath, Adv

JUDGMENT :

This original petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against Ext.P5 order in C.M.A.No.6/2018 dated 28.2.2020 on the file of the Sub Judge, Attingal. The said Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arose out of order in I.A.No.1922/2016 in O.S.No.472/2016 on the file of the Munsiff Court, Attingal. The appellants in the above CMA are the defendants in the above suit and the respondents in I.A.No.1922/2016.

2. I would like to refer the parties in this appeal as 'plaintiff' and 'defendants' for easy discussion and convenience.

3. O.S.472/2016 was filed by the plaintiffs seeking declaration of easement by grant in respect of plaint D schedule pathway for the beneficial enjoyment of Plaint A schedule property owned by the plaintiff. Along with this suit, I.A.No.1922/2016 also was filed seeking temporary injunction restraining the defendants from causing further obstruction to D Schedule pathway and also from causing any inconvenience to the peaceful enjoyment of the D Schedule pathway, till the disposal of the suit.

4. The learned Munsiff anxiously considered the interim application. On finding prima facie case in favour of the plaintiff coupled with other

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top