JUDGMENT :

At the time of hearing of the matter, it was brought to the notice of this Court that owing to the interim order the impact of the impugned decision Ext.P1 was over.

2. Smt.Anjali Radhakrishnan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the decision Ext.P6 merged into Ext.P1 is wholly capricious and stigmatic in as much as at every stage of filling up of examination index card, the examiner is required to mention regarding the previous debarment or not. Such a clause would have a deep impact upon the reputation and service career. On the basis of some complaint whereby a student i.e., George Joseph, 3rd Semester LLM candidate and leader of students' organizations of Government Law College, Ernakulam, awarded lesser marks, an Enquiry Committee was constituted and prior to that petitioner was served with a notice which he replied vide statement Ext.P5. On perusal of the enquiry report none of the factors enumerated in the statement had been referred to except the allegations. Such a decision of the member Syndicate issue recommendation for barring him from the Board of Examiner is wholly preposterous and erroneous. At least entire statement should