ORDER :

The petitioner herein is the husband of the first respondent and the father of respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

2. Aggrieved by order dated 31.01.2017 in M.C.No.420/2013 passed by the court below directing the petitioner to pay monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.4,000/-to the first respondent and Rs.3,000/- to the third respondent, the petitioner has filed this revision petition.

3. Heard.

4. The first respondent contended that the first respondent is unemployed. She is also having no source of income for her livelihood. The first respondent also contended that the petitioner herein is having property worth rupees more than fifty lakh, from which he is getting income. The first respondent further contended that the petitioner is having employment abroad, drawing a salary of Rs.50,000/-per month.

5. The petitioner had contended that the first respondent herein is having job. It was further contended by the petitioner herein that the petitioner is presently having no job. It was further contended by the petitioner that the first respondent had illicit relationship with a person, namely, Praveen and hence the petitioner is not liable to pay maintenance to the first respondent.

6. Apart f