IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S. MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P. CHALY, JJ.
Adv. Prabhu K.N., S/o. K.T. Narayanan - Petitioner
Versus
Kerala State Electricity Board & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 11372 of 2021
Decided On : 01-10-2021
Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 56 , 42 , 56 , 135 (1A) - Kerala Electricity Supply Code, 2014 - Regulation 139,139(1),139(2),122,138,123,123(1)(q), 123 (2)(f) – Constitution of India 1950- Notice for disconnection of electricity- Electricity bill – Vernacular language - Petitioner in person, has contended that Regulation 122 of Kerala Electricity Supply Code, 2014 ,stipulates general provisions relating to billing - Regulation 123 stipulates information to be provided in Electricity bill, by Kerala State Electricity Board ,1st respondent, to consumers - He has contended that even though it is not specifically stipulated in former statute that Electricity bill provided by Board to consumers, should be in vernacular language, it is highly necessary that Board to issue Electricity bill provided to consumers in Malayalam, vernacular language, so as to enable an ordinary citizen to understand contents of same, whereas Board is issuing the Electricity bill provided to the consumers in English - He has further contended that the pattern/format of Electricity bill, provided by Board to the consumers, is per se illegal, as it is titled as "DEMAND CUM DISCONNECTION NOTICE (As per Regulations 122 and 123 of the Kerala Electricity Supply Code, 2014)" in prevailing circumstances, inter alia, that Regulations 122 and 123 do not pertain to disconnection of service/electricity connection.
Finding of the Court:
As far as State of Kerala is concerned, electricity is supplied by Board throughout State. If a separate notice is to be mandated, so far as non-payment of electricity dues is concerned, it would be a laborious process, for the Board spending huge money from the public exchequer - A notice in writing means, it should be made clear in black and white that if the consumer is not paying the bill within the time period prescribed in the bill, the Board will be at liberty to disconnect the supply after 15 clear days’ notice. What the consumer is required, information as to the due date for payment and if not done, what is the consequence thereof is it not provided in the bill. Answer is ‘yes’. The said aspect is clearly mentioned in the bill itself and therefore, the contentions raised by the petitioner that there should be a separate notice issued before the power is disconnected cannot be sustained under law - Taking into account all the above legal and factual circumstances, we have no hesitation to hold that the petitioner is not entitled to get any relief sought for in the writ petition.
Result: Writ Petition dismissed
JUDGMENT :
S. Manikumar, J.
Instant writ petition is filed by Mr. Prabhu K.N., party-in-person, seeking for the following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction to the 1st respondent to issue the electricity bill provided to the consumers in Malayalam, the vernacular language, to enable the consumers, the ordinary citizens, understand the contents of the same.
(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or directions to the 1st respondent not to title the Electricity bill provided by the 1st respondent to the consumers as "DISCONNECTION NOTICE".
(iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction to the 1st respondent not to disconnect the service/Electricity connection of the consumers without serving a separate 15 days' notice for disconnection, as stipulated under Regulation 139(1) of Kerala Electricity Supply Code, 2014.”
2. Mr. Prabhu K.N., petitioner in person, has contended that Regulation 122 of the Kerala Electricity Supply Code, 2014 (for short ‘Supply Code, 2014’) stipulates the general provisions relating to billing. Regulation 123 stipulates the information to be provided in the Electricity bill, by the Kerala State Electricity Board (‘Board’ for short), 1st respondent, to the consumers.
3. He has contended that even though it is not specifically stipulated in the former statute that the Electricity bill provided by the Board to the consumers, should be in vernacular language, it is highly necessary that the Board to issue the Electricity bill provided to the consumers in Malayalam, the vernacular language, so as to enable an ordinary citizen to understand the contents of the same, whereas the Board is issuing the Electricity bill provided to the consumers in English.
4. He has further contended that the pattern/format of Electricity bill, provided by the Board to the consumers, is per se illegal, as it is titled as "DEMAND CUM DISCONNECTION NOTICE (As per Regulations 122 and 123 of the Kerala Electricity Supply Code, 2014)" in the prevailing circumstances, inter alia, that Regulations 122 and 123 do not pertain to disconnection of service/electricity connection.
5. He has further contended that ignoring the specific and transparent stipulations under Regulations 138 and 139 of the Kerala Electricity Supply Code, 2014 read with Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003, Board is illegally making disconnection of service/electric connection of the consumers, without issuing a separate notice for disconnection, as stipulated under Regulation 139(1) of the Kerala Electricity Supply Code, 2014, even in the present pandemic situation.
6. Kerala State Electricity Board Limited – respondent No.1, has filed a detailed counter affidavit refuting the allegations and demands raised in the writ petition. It is submitted that the Board is issuing the bill with all the details, as to the payment to be made, date of the bill, due date of payment, and consequently, the disconnection date. It is also pointed out that the disconnection date contained in the bill is, after a period of 15 clear days from the due date provided in the bill.
7. In this regard, learned standing counsel has also invited our attention to one of the bills produced by the writ petitioner.
8. Further contention made by the learned standing counsel for the Kerala State Electricity Board is that the bill is issued in accordance with Regulations 122 and 123 of the Kerala Electricity Supply Code, 2014.
9. It is also pointed out that what is contemplated under Regulation 139 of the Supply Code 2014 is only a notice in writing with respect to the disconnection date.
10. In order to have a clarity to the issues raised by the petitioner, as regards issuance of the bill, in vernacular, and a separate notice, in contemplation of Regulation 139, and for effectively considering and adjudicating the reliefs sought for, relevant provisions are extracted:
“122. General provisions relating to billing.-(1) On eff
State of Kerala v. A. Lakshmi Kutty
Comptroller and Auditor General of India v. K.S. Jegannathan
State of U.P. and Ors. v. Harish Chandra and Ors.
Oriental Bank of Commerce v. Sunder Lal Jain
Bihar Eastern Gangetic Fishermen Cooperative Society Ltd. v. Sipahi Singh and others
Lekhraj Satramdas Lalvani v. Deputy Custodian-cum-Managing Officer
Dr. Rai Shivendra Bahadur v. The Governing Body of the Nalanda College
Dr. Umakant Saran v. State of Bihar
V.D.S.R.Re. Rolling Mill v. Special Commissioner & Commissioner of Land Administration
Hurhanuddin Hussain v. State of U.P.
Manick Lal Seal v. K.P. Choudhary
Commissioner of Sales Tax and Others v. Subhash & Co.
Karnataka Electricity Board and Another v. B.P. Vasudeva Murthy and Another
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.