JUDGMENT :

Kauser Edappagath, J.

husband who is appellant in all above appeals challenges common judgment passed by Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram (for short “ court below”) in OP Nos.756/2013, 897/13 and 898/13 dated 26/5/2017.

2. marriage between appellant and respondent was solemnized on 1/6/2010 at Trivandrum Club, Vazhuthacaud, Thiruvananthapuram in accordance with Hindu customary rites. There is no issue in wedlock. Admittedly appellant and respondent lived together only till 24/1/2013. appellant was a businessman. father of respondent was also a businessman. definite case of respondent/wife is that right from inception of marriage, their marital life was not cordial and happy. It was alleged that appellant had no interest in sex and failed to discharge his marital obligation as a husband. In bedroom he was more interested in seeing obscene pornographic videos, it was alleged. According to respondent, appellant used to pick up quarrel with her for no reason. It was further alleged that appellant had always entertained suspicion about morality and chastity of respondent and on many occasions, he even asked her whether she shared bed w