SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ker) 881

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ.
K.Vineeth Kumar, S/o. Karunakaran Nair – Appellant
Versus
Travancore Devaswom Board – Respondent
WP(C) No. 25040 of 2021
Decided on : 12-11-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, SMT.SNEHA ROSE, SMT.P.S.ARUNA
For the Respondent: SRI G.SANTHOSH KUMAR, SRI A.S.P KURUP - ADV

Point of Law: Any public auction of the right to open temporary shops/stalls in the Devaswom ground in front of Ettumanoor Sree Mahadeva Temple temple and also in the Kovil Padam Road owned by Devaswom can be conducted only in terms of the general guidelines framed.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Tender – Bidder - Right to erect temporary stall during festival seasons - Public auction - Petitioner and other similar vendors, nearly seven in number, are the usual bidders, who bid space in Devaswom ground for conducting shops on a seasonal basis. Every year there will be an increase of 5% to 10% in the upset price fixed for the space. For the Navaratri festival, the 3rd respondent Deputy Devaswom Commissioner conducted the auction without any tender notice, to favour some outsiders to come into the field.

Finding of the court: Petitioner and other similar vendors, nearly seven in number, are usual bidders, who bid space in Devaswom ground for conducting shops on a seasonal basis. For Navaratri festival, the 3rd respondent Deputy Devaswom Commissioner conducted auction without any tender notice, to favour some outsiders to come into field. Petitioner and other similar vendors, styling themselves as ‘usual bidders’ cannot claim any preferential right in public auction of the right to erect temporary stalls in Devaswom ground in front of Ettumanoor Sree Mahadeva Temple, during Temple festivals. The officers of Travancore Devaswom Board shall take necessary steps to ensure that conduct of trade in stalls/shops is strictly in terms of the directions contained in two decisions referred to supra and guidelines issued by Board - At time of the auction held 3rd respondent Deputy Devaswom Commissioner has pointed out Board Order to conduct auction during current year, taking into account tender amount (auctioned amount) for te last three years. In view of that Board Order, minimum tender amount (upset price) for right to erect temporary stalls in Devaswom ground in front of Ettumanoor Sree Mahadeva Temple, during Mandala Makaravilakku Maholsavam 1197 ME, will have to be the average of tender amount (auctioned amount) for the previous three years with 10% increase. The very same criteria are being adopted in all temples under the Travancore Devaswom Board. The said Board order is not under challenge in this writ petition.

Result: Writ petition dismissed

JUDGMENT :

Anil K. Narendran, J

W.P.(C) No.25040 of 2021 & Report No.69 in D.B.A.No.2 of 2010

The issue involved in W.P.(C)No.25040 of 2021 and Report No.69 in D.B.A.No.2 of 2010 relates to Ext.P2 tender notice dated 01.11.2021 issued by the 3rd respondent Deputy Devaswom Commissioner, Travancore Devaswom Board, Vaikom, regarding the public auction of the right to erect temporary stalls in the Devaswom ground in front of Ettumanoor Sree Mahadeva Temple, during Mandala Makaravilakku Maholsavam 1197ME, for the period from 15.11.2021 to 20.01.2022.

2. W.P.(C)No.25040 of 2021 is one filed by Sri K. Vineeth Kumar, who is stated to be the successful bidder of the right to erect temporary stall during festival seasons in the Devaswom ground in front of Ettumanoor Sree Mahadeva Temple to conduct a Photo Shop, for years together. In the writ petition, it is stated that the petitioner and other similar vendors, nearly seven in number, are the usual bidders, who bid space in Devaswom ground for conducting shops on a seasonal basis. Every year there will be an increase of 5% to 10% in the upset price fixed for the space. For the Navaratri festival, the 3rd respondent Deputy Devaswom Commissioner conducted the auction on 30.09.2021, without any tender notice, to favour some outsiders to come into the field. The petitioner along with six other vendors submitted Ext.P1 representation dated 30.09.2021 before the 5th respondent Advocate Commissioner and at his instance, a tender notice was issued and the auction was conducted on 04.10.2021. The petitioner and other vendors quoted a reasonably high rate of ground rent and the Advocate Commissioner fixed the rate at Rs.1,500/-per sq.ft., fixing Rs.15,000/-for 10 sq.ft. Accordingly, the petitioner bid the said premises from 04.10.2021 and the period expired on 30.10.2021.

2.1. The 3rd respondent issued Ext.P2 tender notice dated 01.11.2021, regarding the public auction of the right to erect temporary stalls in the Devaswom ground in front of Ettumanoor Sree Mahadeva Temple, during Mandala Makaravilakku Maholsavam 1197ME, for the period from 15.11.2021 to 20.01.2022. As per Ext.P3 notice, the auction will be conducted under the supervision of the 5th respondent Advocate Commissioner, on 08.11.2021. According to the petitioner, in violation of tender conditions, the 3rd respondent arbitrarily fixed a condition that the minimum tender amount (upset price) will be the average of the tender amount (auctioned amount) for the previous three years with 10% increase. This was objected to by the petitioner and other bidders. The petitioner demanded fixation of the minimum tender amount at 5% above the tender amount for the previous year, i.e., Rs.1,575/-per sq.ft. However, the 5th respondent Advocate Commissioner fixed the minimum tender amount as Rs.1,650/-per sq.ft., which was objected to by the 3rd respondent, and therefore tender could not be finalised.

2.2. The petitioner submitted Ext.P3 representation dated 08.11.2021 before the 2nd respondent Devaswom Commissioner with a request to fix the minimum tender amount (upset price) during Mandala Makaravilakku Maholsavam 1197ME, 10% above the tender amount (auctioned amount) for the previous year, instead of 10% above the average tender amount for the previous three years. In the writ petition, it is alleged that there is a rift between the Devaswom officials, especially respondents 3 and 4, and the 5th respondent Advocate Commissioner, who is supervising the conduct of tender from the year 2008 onwards.

2.3. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to complete the tender proceedings regarding the public auction of the right to erect temporary stalls in the Devaswom ground in front of Ettumannoor Sree Mahadeva Temple during Mandala Makaravilakku Maholsavam 1197ME, on or before 16.11.2021; a declaration that the decision of the 5th respondent Advocate Commis

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top