VIJU ABRAHAM
Kulakkada Grama Panchayath – Appellant
Versus
Sabu Thomas – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Above writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P9 order passed by the 3rd respondent Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions, in Appeal No. 337 of 2015, whereby the order passed by the 2nd petitioner, cancelling Ext.P1 building permit issued in favour of the 1st respondent was set aside.
2. The facts of the case, in brief, are as follows :
The 1st respondent filed an application before the 2nd petitioner for issuance of a building permit for construction of a vehicle service station and pursuant to the same Ext.P1 building permit was issued on 16.12.2014. On the strength of Ext.P1 building permit, 1st respondent undertook the construction work. While so, Ext.P2 notice dated 26.3.2015 was affixed by the petitioners at the construction site of the 1st respondent intimating that Ext.P1 building permit issued to the 1st respondent is cancelled and that no construction shall be undertaken at the site. After issuance of Ext.P2, a major portion of the building constructed by the 1st respondent was demolished by the petitioners. Challenging Ext.P2, the 1st respondent filed Ext.P3 appeal before the 3rd respondent, Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions. The petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.