ANU SIVARAMAN
Madhulal M. G. – Appellant
Versus
Director of Mining and Geology, Directorate of Mining and Geology – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs.
(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to re-consider Ext.P1 application for quarrying permit submitted by the petitioner, de hors Exhibit P2, and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of 2 weeks.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Senior Government Pleader.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner's application to grant quarrying permit had been rejected by the 2nd respondent by Ext.P7 order citing that it does not satisfy the distance criteria prescribed in Exhibit P2 order issued by the National Green Tribunal. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Exhibit P2 order of the National Green Tribunal has been set aside in Exhibit P9 judgment, and that the application, therefore, is liable to be considered independently. It is further stated in Exhibit P7 order
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.