IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S. MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P. CHALY, JJ.
Suo Motu - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Kerala, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 11324 of 2018
Decided On : 10-11-2021
Kerala Municipality Act, 1994 - Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 2019 -Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Depletion of ground water resources – Definition of Ground water” , “Well” , . “Digging - Writ petitions seeking for protection from obstructions caused due to digging of bore wells and tube wells, took note of various paper reports, which projected an alarming situation with respect to depletion of ground water resources – whether action has been taken against any owner or user of the Well, contravening the provisions of the Kerala Ground Water (Control and Regulation) Act, 2002 or rules made thereunder.
Finding of the Court:
“digging” with all its grammatical variations and synonyms, includes digging or drilling of new wells, putting in pipes or drilling, making tunnels or increasing depth or diameter of the existing wells - Disaster Management Act, 2005, empowers the Central, as well as State Governments, for taking appropriate action, in order to prevent the disasters, providing drinking water, essential provisions, health care and services in an affected area, apart from the power to take such other action, as may be necessary for the proper administration and management of mitigating disasters, in contemplation of the provisions of Disaster Management Act, 2005.
Result: writ petition is disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
S. Manikumar, J.
Instant public interest writ petition has been registered suo motu on the basis of a reference made by a Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the order dated 22.3.2018 as regards depletion of ground water resources.
2. Relevant portion of the order dated 22.3.2018 reads thus:
“9. Prima facie we are of the opinion that the Governments both at the Centre and the State has to seriously look at the problem not with respect to the present circumstances alone; but with a vision for preserving water for the future generations. Ground Water preservation measures if not taken up on war footing; the very life on earth will be endangered. We are not for a moment struggling that there should be deprivation now, to keep for the future. But the tapping of resources should be by way of a comprehensive plan to ensure sustenance and also to rejuvenate the sources. We remember with trepidation the prophecy that the third world war will be fought for drinking water. The successive Governments have failed to address the concern with due seriousness and in that context this Court, exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction, in Public Interest should look into the pressing problem of impending total depletion of water resources; in the context of the Public Trust Doctrine. We direct the Registry to take on record the above order with the annexures and suo motu register a writ petition as a Public Interest Litigation with the above parties and place the matter before the Hon'ble The Chief Justice for orders to post the case before the Bench having jurisdiction for PIL or any other appropriate Bench.”
3. Short facts required for the disposal of the writ petition are that; this Court, while dealing with a spate of writ petitions seeking for protection from obstructions caused due to digging of bore wells and tube wells, took note of various paper reports, which projected an alarming situation with respect to depletion of ground water resources.
4. The Court further observed that both Central and State Governments have to seriously look at the problem with a vision for preserving water for the future generations and that, there should be a comprehensive plan for tapping of resources. The successive Governments have failed to address the issue with due seriousness. In that context, exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction, this Court, in public interest, should look into the pressing problem of impending total depletion of water resources. The Court also directed the registry to take on record the above order with annexures and register a suo motu writ petition as a Public Interest Litigation, with the parties mentioned in the order. Hence, this writ petition.
5. Refuting the averments in the writ petition, Kerala State Ground Water Department, represented by its Secretary, Government, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram, 7th respondent has filed a statement dated 28th September, 2021, wherein it was contended as under:
A. The present suo motu writ petition has been initiated out of misconception of the public that bore Wells and tube Wells are extracting yield from the same aquifer (an aquifer is an underground layer of water-bearing permeable rock, rock fractures or unconsolidated materials viz., gravel, sand, or silt where the ground water is stored), which are being relied by the open Wells and thus, lead to depletion of water in the open Wells.
B. Bore Wells tap fractured aquifers in confined/semi confined condition, whereas open Wells tap unconfined aquifers only. According to the general principles of Groundwater Hydrogeology, confined and semi confined aquifers are not interconnected as their terminology denotes, and so extraction of water from the confined/ semi confined aquifer through bore Wells will not normally interfere with the adjoining open Well tapping the unconfined aquifers. But there are rare cases, where ope
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and Others
Perumatty Grama Panchayath v. State of Kerala
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (P) Ltd. v. Perumatty Grama Panchayath
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.