ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Principal, Sabari Ptb Smaraka H. S. S, Adakkaputhur – Appellant
Versus
Additional Registering Authority – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. central motor vehicles rules prescribe detailed vehicle standards. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court emphasizes the importance of vehicle safety for school transportation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observed failures in implementing vehicle safety standards. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. judicial oversight on compliance with vehicle regulations and safety] (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. specified standards must be enforced for road safety compliance. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER :
In Avishek Goenka v. Union of India [(2012) 5 SCC 321], after referring to the provisions under Rules 100, 104, 104A, 106, 119 and 120 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 the Apex Court held that the Central Motor Vehicles Rules deal with every minute detail of construction and maintenance of a vehicle. In other words, the standards, sizes and specifications which the manufacturer of a vehicle is required to adhere to while manufacturing the vehicle are exhaustively dealt with under the Rules. What is permitted has been specifically provided for and what has not been specifically stated would obviously be deemed to have been excluded from these Rules. It would neither be permissible nor possible for the court to read into these statu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.