SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ker) 52

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S. MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P. CHALY, JJ.
The Secretary, Mavelikkara-Thekkekkara Grama Panchayat – Appellant
Versus
Gopinathan Pillai S/o Shankarapillai – Respondent
W.A. No. 165 of 2022
Decided On : 02-02-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : R. Gireesh Varma.
For the Respondents: R. Sunil Kumar, Tek Chand.

Point of law: Though R.14(1) of the Kerala Minor Minerals Concessions Rules, 2015 require a quarrying permit for extraction of ordinary earth, R.14(2) provides that, a quarrying permit is not required in cases where the extraction is in connection with the construction of buildings which do not require environmental clearance, provided that, the construction is on a valid building permit.

Headnote:

Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 - Rule 14(2) - Building permission– Residential building - Application seeking for land development permit to remove ordinary earth from plot owned by him where he is proposing to construct building and for its transportation - Technical Officer has inspected site and reported that earth to be removed for purpose of construction can be deposited and levelled in very same property- Whether earth is to be removed, extent of area to be levelled, quantity of ordinary earth to be extracted for such construction.

Finding of the Court:

Court are of the view that Geologist/respondent cannot insist for issuance of development permit from Panchayat, insofar as transit of earth is concerned - Even though learned counsel for appellants, submitted that as per instructions contained in said Government Order, building plan has to be produced, it is contention of learned counsel for first respondent that while seeking building permit, plan has already been submitted - Be that as it may, it is for Panchayat as well as the District Geologist, Department of Mining and Geology, Alappuzha, respondent to strictly follow decision of this Court in Ramachandran (supra) as well as the Government Order and pass orders permitting first respondent/writ petitioner to remove sand depending upon extent required, which shall be quantified by Panchayat and transit permit shall also be issued by Geologist, respondent, in accordance with law, as discussed - In the light of discussion, direction of writ court to appellants to issue development permit is set aside - Directions for issuance of transit pass by Geologist shall remain intact.

Result: Appeal is allowed

JUDGMENT :

S. MANIKUMAR, J.

1. Appellants, who are the respondents 1 and 2 in W.P. (C) No. 12066 of 2021, challenges the judgment dated 29.07.2021 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in the aforesaid writ petition filed by the 1st respondent herein seeking a direction to the Secretary, Mavelikkara-Thekkekkara Grama Panchayat, 1st appellant, to issue land development permit to the writ petitioner for extraction and transportation of ordinary earth from the property, for the construction of a residential building.

2. Gopinathan Pillai S/o Shankarapillai, Kulathintekizhakkathil, Thekkekkara, Allappuzha, writ petitioner, who is the owner of 12.14 Ares of property situated in Re-Survey No. 645/21 of Thekkekkara Village, applied for a building permit to construct a residential building having an area of 178.36 Sq. m. He has submitted Exhibit P1 application seeking for land development permit to remove ordinary earth from the plot owned by him where he is proposing to construct the building and for its transportation.

3. Thereafter, the Technical Officer has inspected the site and reported that the earth to be removed for the purpose of construction can be deposited and levelled in the very same property. As there is no ‘development’ of the land as defined in the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, 2019 (Rules, 2019 for short) the Secretary, Mavelikkara-Thekkekara Grama Panchayat and Mavelikkara Thekkekkara Grama Panchayat, appellants rejected his application for development permit. At the same time building permit was granted to him. Hence the writ petition.

4. Adverting to the rival submissions and taking note of Rule 14(2) of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 (Rules, 2015 for short), writ court, vide judgment dated 29th July, 2021 ordered thus:

    7. In this context, it is to be noted that in view of Rule 14(2) of Kerala Minor and Mineral Concession Rules, the petitioner cannot extract and transport red earth without a mineral transit pass issued by the Geologist and statutorily the Geologist will not be legally justified, if mineral transit passes are issued in the absence of a land development permit. The fact that extraction of red earth is required from the land of the petitioner for construction of his house, is not in dispute. In the circumstances, if the respondents 1 and 2 refused to issue land development permit that will put the petitioner in a peculiar situation and the petitioner will have to face even prosecution under the Kerala Minor and Mineral Concession Rules, if the extracted red earth is to be transported.

In the circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that the respondents 1 and 2 are compellable to issue land development permit of the petitioner so as to enable the petitioner to obtain mineral transit pass from the Geologist. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents 1 and 2 to issue land development permit to the petitioner enabling the petitioner to obtain mineral transmit pass from the Geologist, within a period of four weeks.

5. Being aggrieved, the Secretary, Mavelikkara Grama Panchayat and Mavelikkara Thekkekkara Grama Panchayat, represented by its Secretary, respondents 1 and 2 in the writ petition, have filed the instant appeal on the grounds inter-alia that development permit and transit permit, are not required for the removal of the sand. In support of the above contention, learned counsel for the appellants placed reliance on the provisions of the Rules, 2019, especially Rule 5 and a decision of this Court in Ramachandran T.K. and Another vs. Vellavoor Grama Panchayat and Others, 2021 (5) KHC 51 : 2021 (5) KLT 1.

6. In Ramachandran (supra), a learned single Judge, after considering Rule 14(2) of the Rules, 2015 and in particular the second proviso, held that no development permit is required.

7. That apart, the appellants have also relied on Annexure II Government Order, G.O. (Ordinary) No. 1795/2021/LSGD dated 18.09.2021, in which it has been c

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      Judicial Analysis

      SupremeToday

      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top