SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.P. Gopalan Nambiyar, J.
SUNDARAM CHETTIAR (S.) - Appellant
Vs.
GOPALAN (K.) AND ANOTHER - Respondent
Decided On : 31-01-1967

The appellate authority under section 18(2) of the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960, has the jurisdiction to decide the disputed question of termination of service.

Headnote:

Jurisdiction - Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960 - Appellate authority's jurisdiction to entertain appeal and decide termination of service

Fact of the Case:

The employer terminated the services of the employee. The employee filed an appeal under section 18(2) of the Act. The employer issued a notice for disciplinary proceedings after the appeal was filed, claiming the employee was still in service.

Finding of the Court:

The appellate authority had jurisdiction to decide whether there was a termination of service. It found that the notice regarding disciplinary proceedings was not bona fide, and there was indeed a termination of service.

Issues: The main issue was whether the appellate authority had jurisdiction to decide the disputed question of termination of service.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the appellate authority can proceed to find whether there was a termination of service or not, and in this case, it found that the notice regarding disciplinary proceedings did not erase or cancel the order of termination.

Final Decision: The appeal was rightly entertained by the appellate authority, and the original petition was dismissed with no costs.

JUDGMENT :

V.P. Gopalan Nambiyar, J.—The only question argued is whether the appellate authority u/s 18 of the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960, had Jurisdiction to entertain the appeal filed before it and to decide whether there was, in fact, a termination of service of the employee.

2. The petitioner is the employer, who, it has been alleged and found, terminated the services of respondent 1 on 10 March 1963. Respondent 1 filed an appeal u/s 18(2) of the Act before respondent 2 on 19 March 1963. Meanwhile, on 15 March 1963 the petitioner had issued a notice to respondent 1 to show cause against disciplinary proceedings, treating respondent 1 still, as an employee in service. On these facts it is argued that on the date when the appeal was filed, there was no termination of service of respondent 1 and that respondent 2 had no jurisdiction to decide the disputed question as to whether there was a termination of service or not. I am clear that respondent 2, can, in a case of dispute proceed to find whether there was a termination of service or not. In the instant case it has found that the notice regarding disciplinary proceedings was not bona fide, and in spite of the same, there was a termination of service. If respondent 2 has no power to decide this disputed question Section 18(2) of the Act can be easily rendered nugatory.

3. The decision in 1953 (I) LLJ 573 is clearly distinguishable, as that was a case where, on the date of the order on appeal, there was a clear cancellation of the order of termination. In the present case there was none and the notice of disciplinary proceedings, which is claimed to have that effect, was found to be not bona fide, and in no way to erase or cancel the order of termination.

4. The appeal was rightly entertained by respondent 2 and I see no ground to interfere with its finding.

5. The original petition is dismissed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top