SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.P. Gopalan Nambiyar, G. Balagangadharan Nair, JJ.
KARTHIAYANI SREEMATHI AND OTHERS - Appellant
Vs.
DT. COLLECTOR AND OTHERS - Respondent
Decided On : 16-11-1978

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the legal representatives of a deceased employer can be held liable for the arrears of dues under the Kerala Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1969, and the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968, without the need to set aside any transactions or documents transferring title to them. The judgment emphasizes the availability of the remedy of preferring objections or claims against the recovery process.

Headnote:

employer - legal representatives of deceased employer - Kerala Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1969, Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 - Sections 2(c), 2(e), 68 - The court discussed the definition of 'employer' under Section 2(c) of the Kerala Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1969, and the definition of 'defaulter' under Section 2(e) of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968, read with Section 68. The court examined the statutory provisions, including the contribution payable by the employer, the determination of amount due, and the recovery process. The court also considered relevant case law and legal principles to determine the liability of the legal representatives of the deceased employer for the arrears of dues.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved the legal representatives of a deceased abkari contractor who were summoned to appear for proceedings to determine the amount payable under the Kerala Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1969. The legal heirs contested their liability, and the court was tasked with determining whether the legal representatives could be held liable for the arrears of dues from the deceased employer.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the legal representatives of the deceased employer were liable for the arrears of dues. It held that the statutory provisions and case law supported the invocation of coercive processes for recovery of arrears of dues from the legal representatives, even without setting aside any transactions or documents purporting to transfer title to the legal representatives. The court emphasized that the legal representatives had the remedy of preferring objections or claims against the recovery process.

Issues: The main issue was whether the legal representatives of the deceased employer could be held liable for the arrears of dues under the Kerala Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1969, and the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on statutory provisions, case law, and legal principles to establish that the legal representatives could be held liable for the arrears of dues without the need to set aside any transactions or documents transferring title to them. The court emphasized the availability of the remedy of preferring objections or claims against the recovery process.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petitions, holding that the legal representatives were liable for the arrears of dues and that they had the remedy of preferring objections or claims against the recovery process.

JUDGMENT :

V.P. Gopalan Nambiyar, J.—These O.Ps. were referred to a Division Bench by our learned brother Chandrasekara Menon, J., in an elaborated order of reference running nearly to ten typed pages, as the learned Judge felt that the questions raised are not only of interest in an academic sense but also of great importance. The question itself as stated shortly by the learned Judge is whether the legal representatives of the deceased employer would fall within the definition of the term "employer" in Section 2(c) of the Kerala Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Act and of the term "defaulter" in Section 2(e) of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968, read with Section 68 of the said Act. We shall notice the facts first in O.P. No. 4816 of 1976 in which the main arguments were advanced. Counsel in the other writ petition practically associated himself with the said arguments.

O.P. No. 4816 of 1976

2. The four writ petitioners are the daughters of one Krishnan Padmanabhan, an abkari contractor who died on 11.11.1972. Besides the petitioners, the deceased had a son Sridharan and another daughter Karthiyayani Ratnamma. The deceased had bid toddy shops No. 13 (sic)Adoor and T.S. No. 14 in Thuvayur and T.S. No. 15 in Ezhamkulum in Kunnathur range, T.S. No. 8 in Chittoor in Karunagappally range, and T.S. No. 8 in Pulamon in Kottarakara range. He was conducting these shops till his death, and thereafter the business is being continued by his only son Sridharan. The petitioners alleged that they had nothing to do with the business. By document No. 863/1972 of the Chavara Sub Registrar's Office dated 19.3.1972, Krishnan Padmanabhan and the members of his family partitioned the properties. On the date of his death, an extent of 1 acre 71 cents of land stood in the name of the deceased Padmanabhan. Out of this, 35 cents are stated to have been acquired for the National High Way as evidenced by Ext. P1 notice. In a partition suit O.S. No. 60 of 1974. Sub Court Quilon, the estate of the deceased was directed to be partitioned by a preliminary decree dated 30.9.1975. Final decree is awaited. Meanwhile the Welfare Fund Inspector, Quilon initiated proceedings for determination of the amount payable under Section. 8 of the Kerala Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1969 for the shops bid by deceased Padmanabhan for the period during which the deceased was conducting the shops. The legal heirs of the deceased were summoned to appear. The petitioners appeared and contested their liability. But the Inspector determined the amount of contribution and the balance amount due for each of the shops and passed Exts. P2 to P6 assessment orders making the heirs jointly and severally liable. These were on dates ranging between 10.11.1975 and 17.3.1976. In pursuance of these orders revenue recovery proceedings by attachment of movables were initiated for the recovery of the amount assessed. Apprehending further action the petitioners filed a writ petition attacking the revenue recovery proceedings as without jurisdiction and prayed for a writ of prohibition forbidding respondents from taking any steps under the Toddy Workers Welfare Fund Act and the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act to collect the contribution to the welfare fund from the petitioners for the toddy shops conducted by the deceased Padmanabhan; and for certiorari to quash Exts. P2 to P6 orders. A detailed counter-affidavit has been filed by the District Collector, Quilon and the 1st respondent. Paragraph 2 of the counter-affidavit has stated in a tabular form the various amounts which were advised for recovery against the deceased Padmanabhan for arrears of abkari revenue, The amount includes arrears towards the toddy workers welfare fund. The total amount advised for recovery was Rs. 80,077.30. Out of this an amount of Rs. 59,643.84 was collected, The counter-affidavits states that for realisation of the arrears demand notices were issued to the defaulter on 18.7.1969, 26.7.1969, 25.7.1970, 28.7.1970, 11.11.19

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top