SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Viswanatha Iyer, J.
PADMA MENON - Appellant
Vs.
GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS - Respondent
Decided On : 09-03-1979

Headnote:

Insurance - Termination of Service - General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Section 4, 9, 10, 16 - The court discussed the scope and effect of the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 and concluded that the National Insurance Company Ltd. continued to be a company governed by the Companies Act and did not fall under 'other authorities' mentioned in Article 12 of the Constitution. The court also distinguished the provisions relating to the General Insurance Corporation of India from other statutory bodies established under different enactments. The court held that the employees of the acquired companies did not acquire a statutory status and their relationship continued to be governed by the terms of the contract of employment. The court further emphasized that the employees of companies incorporated under the Companies Act do not get any statutory status to complain against any action taken against them by the companies in violation of any contractual provision.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, an employee of the General Assurance Society Ltd., challenged the termination of her service by the National Insurance Company Ltd. The petitioner contended that the termination order was in the nature of a punishment and that she was entitled to an opportunity of being heard before the termination.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the National Insurance Company Ltd. continued to be a company governed by the Companies Act and did not fall under 'other authorities' mentioned in Article 12 of the Constitution. The court held that the employees of the acquired companies did not acquire a statutory status and their relationship continued to be governed by the terms of the contract of employment. The court concluded that the petition under Article 226 was not maintainable and dismissed the petition.

Issues: The issues involved the determination of whether the National Insurance Company Ltd. fell under 'other authorities' mentioned in Article 12 of the Constitution and whether the termination of the petitioner's service required an opportunity of being heard.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 and the distinction between statutory bodies established under different enactments. The court emphasized that the employees of companies incorporated under the Companies Act do not acquire a statutory status to complain against any action taken against them by the companies in violation of any contractual provision.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, holding that the National Insurance Company Ltd. did not fall under 'other authorities' mentioned in Article 12 of the Constitution and that the employees did not acquire a statutory status. The court concluded that the petition under Article 226 was not maintainable.

JUDGMENT :

Viswanatha Iyer, J.—The petitioner entered the service of the Cochin Divisional office of the General Assurance Society Ltd., as a field officer with effect from 1.10.1969. One of the terms of appointment was that she should guarantee a minimum business of Rs. 35,000 in Fire, Motor, Marine and Miscellaneous Insurance and a minimum premium income of Rs. 3,000 per mensem. As part of her duty she has to organise an effective agency force and work in consonance with the provisions of the Insurance Act and the Rules. She was on probation for six months and during that period her appointment was terminable without any notice. She completed her probation successfully and her service was regularised in due course. While so in September, 1972 the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, Act 57 of 1972 was passed by the Parliament. By this Act the shares in the capital of every Indian Insurance Company was statutorily transferred to and vested in the Central Government. The Central Government was directed to form a Government company in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act to be known as the Central Insurance Corporation of India for the purpose of superintending controlling and carrying on the business of general insurance. On such formation the shares in the capital of every Indian Insurance company which got statutorily transferred to and vested in the Central Government as above were transferred to the Corporation. Provision was also made empowering the Central Government to frame one or more schemes providing for the merger of one Insurance company with another or for the formation of a new company by the amalgamation of two or more Insurance companies. On framing such a scheme the undertaking no any Indian Insurance company was to vest of the acquiring company. On such a merger the service of all officers and other employees of the Indian Insurance Company which ceased to exist by reason of the scheme were directed to be continued in the acquiring company on the same terms and conditions which they were getting or as the case may be by which they are governed immediately before the commencement of the scheme. A scheme called National Insurance Compane Ltd., (Merger) Scheme, 1973 was framed by the Central Government which came into force on 1st January, 1974. General Assurancs Society Ltd. was one of the nine companiee which were merged with the National Insurance Company Ltd., under this scheme. Clause 5 of that scheme provided that every whole time officer or other employee of the merged company shall from the date of merger become an officer of the transferee company and shall hold office on the same terms and conditions and with the same rights as to pension, gratuity and other matters as would have been admissible, to him if there had been no such transfer or merger and shall continue to do so unless and until his employment in the transferee company is terminated or until his remuneration, terms and conditions are duly altered by the transferee company or by any other scheme framed under the Act. Under this provision the petitioner became an officer of the National Insurance Co. Ltd., Subsequently all officers of the National Insurance Co. were required to submit a bio data some time in 1975 by the respective units. The petitioner also filed a pro forma showing the details. Thereafter the petitioner was directed to appear before a committee for interview. Though she withdrew advance allowance to proceed to Madras and appear for the interview, she did not go, and according to her this was due to her illness. She wrote a letter on 11.3.1976 expressing her inability to reach Madras and a certificate from a Civil Surgeon was sent along with it. The interview was to take place on 12th March, 1976. On 17th March the Administrative Officer of the Divisional Office met the petitioner at her residence and informed her that her absence for the interview was not appreciated by the Divisional Office. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top