IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Anil K. Narendran, J.
Kilkotagiri and Thirumbadi Plantations Limited - Appellants
Vs.
District Police Chief, Kozhikode Rural and Ors. - Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 12264 of 2020 (G)
Decided On : 24-09-2020
For the Appellant : P.T. Mohankumar, Adv.
For the Respondents: Sheji P. Abraham, Adv., P.P. Thajudheen, Sr. Government Pleader
The judgment emphasizes the duty of the police to protect life, liberty, property, human rights, and dignity of all persons in accordance with the law, and the need for a balance between worker rights and the prevention of violence and obstruction of business activities.
Headnote:
Police Protection - Labour Dispute - Kerala Police Act, 2011 - Section 3, Section 4 - The court directed the District Labour Officer to initiate conciliation to resolve the dispute and extended the interim order for police protection until further orders. The court emphasized the duty of the police to protect life, liberty, property, human rights, and dignity of all persons in accordance with the law, as per Section 4 of the Act. The judgment also highlighted the right to unionize, the right to strike as part of collective bargaining, and the need for peaceful strikes. The court balanced the rights of the workers with the need for police protection to prevent violence and obstruction of business activities.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a company engaged in rubber production, sought police protection against trade unions and workers obstructing its business activities due to labour issues. The court admitted the matter and granted an interim order for police protection.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the District Labour Officer to initiate conciliation to resolve the dispute and extended the interim order for police protection until further orders. It emphasized the duty of the police to protect life, liberty, property, human rights, and dignity of all persons in accordance with the law.
Issues: Labour dispute, police protection, conciliation proceedings, obstruction of business activities, worker rights, and peaceful strikes.
Ratio Decidendi: The court balanced the rights of the workers with the need for police protection to prevent violence and obstruction of business activities. It highlighted the duty of the police to protect life, liberty, property, human rights, and dignity of all persons in accordance with the law.
Final Decision: The court directed the District Labour Officer to proceed with the conciliation proceedings and the Station House Officer to maintain law and order in the business premises of the petitioner company in case of any threat or obstruction by the trade unions and its members.
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
1. The petitioner is a company engaged in the business of producing natural rubber latex, which owns rubber plantation as well as factory for processing natural rubber latex at Mukkam in Kozhikode District. The petitioner company, which is engaging around 400 permanent employees and 175 casual workers, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 and 2 to afford and render necessary Police protection against the illegal obstructions caused by respondents 3 to 8 trade unions and their men, from operating and maintaining the plantation, factories and business of the company and from causing any hindrance to the procurement and transportation of raw materials and dispatching the processed goods and other ancillary and incidental activities connected thereto and further directing respondents 1 and 2 to take all legal steps necessary to ensure the routine business activities in the business premises of the company, by engaging workers who are willing to work and to do whatever is required to maintain law and order in the business premises, for protecting the properties and lives of the employees of the petitioner company.
2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, on account of certain labour issues with respondents 3 to 8 trade unions and workers who are members of those trade unions, the petitioner company submitted Ext. P5 representation before the District Labour Officer, Kozhikode for holding conciliation talk. Though conciliation talk was held on 10.06.2020, the office bearers of respondents 3 to 8 trade unions and workers did not yield to any amicable settlement. After the failure of conciliation talk, the workers become more aggressive and they started obstructing free ingress and egress of men and materials, consequent to which large quantities of processed rubber latex is lying as dead stock in the factory premises. The striking workers threatened the willing workers and substitutes with dire consequences. Even the administrative staff members of the petitioner company are threatened with dire consequences and their lives are in danger. The petitioner company submitted Ext. P7 representation dated 11.06.2020 before the 1st respondent District Police Chief seeking police protection and thereafter moved this writ petition before this Court, on 18.06.2020.
3. On 22.06.2020, when this writ petition came up for admission, this Court admitted the matter on file. The learned Senior Government Pleader took notice for respondents 1, 2 and 9. The petitioner was directed to take out notice to respondents 3 to 8. While ordering the writ petition to be listed on 23.07.2020 for the counter affidavit of the respondents, this Court granted an interim order as prayed for, i.e., an order directing respondents 1 and 2 to afford necessary protection to the petitioner company, to carry out its routine business activities, with the workers willing to work and to maintain law and order in its business premises by ensuring the life and liberty of its employees, till that date. The learned Senior Government Pleader was directed to communicate the gist of the order dated 22.06.2020 to respondents 1, 2 and 9 for prompt action.
4. On 22.07.2020, when this writ petition came up for consideration, the District Labour Officer, Kozhikode was suo motu impleaded as additional 10th respondent. It was submitted by the learned counsel for respondents 3 to 8 trade unions that the workers are deprived of their legitimate dues, i.e., their salary and other benefits. This Court by the order dated 23.07.2020 directed the additional 10th respondent District Labour Officer to initiate conciliation to resolve the dispute at the earliest, and extended the interim order granted on 22.06.2020, until further orders, and the learned Government Pleader was directed to intimate that order to the additional 10th respondent.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the