ANIL K.NARENDRAN, P.G.AJITHKUMAR
Fathima Beevi – Appellant
Versus
Joly John – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ajithkumar, J.
This is an appeal preferred under Order XLIII, Rule 1(j) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The appellant challenges the order dated 26.10.2021 by which the Additional Sub Court, Kottayam, dismissed E.A.No.205 of 2019 filed by the appellant seeking to set aside sale held on 13.3.2019 in E.P.No.39 of 2018 in O.S.No.279 of 2010.
2. O.S.No.279 of 2010 was filed by the respondent herein seeking a decree of specific performance with an alternative relief of return of the advance amount paid. The amount said to have been paid as advance is Rs.3,50,000/-. The suit was settled in the Lok Adalath. An award was accordingly passed allowing the respondent to realise an amount of Rs.4,50,000/-. The award further stipulated that, in default of payment of the said amount on or before 20.02.2012, the respondent would be entitled to realise the decree amount along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. The appellant did not make payment in terms of the said award. Therefore, this award was put in execution. In E.P.No.39 of 2018 filed before the Additional Sub Court, Kottayam, two items of property belonging to the appellant were attached. Her property was eventually b
A.V.Papayya Sastry v. Government of AP
Deepa Bhargava and Another v. Mahesh Bhargava and others
Desh Bandhu Guptha v. N.L.Anand & Rajinder Singh
K.N.Govindankutty Menon v. C.D.Shaji
Kayjay Industries (P) Ltd. v. Asnew Drums (P) Ltd. and others
Kerala Ceramics Ltd. v. Sebastian
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.