SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ker) 156

N.NAGARESH
Great India Estate Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union Bank of India, Rep. by its Chairman, Mumbai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K. Praveen Kumar.
For the Respondents: A.S.P. Kurup, Sadchith P. Kurup.

JUDGMENT :

N. NAGARESH, J.

1. The petitioner is M/s. Great India Estate Private Limited, a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 in the year 1991. The petitioner seeks to quash Ext.P3 and to declare that the respondents cannot withhold or freeze the account of the petitioner without any legal grounds.

2. The petitioner holds a Current Account bearing No. 395801010036375 with the 1st respondent-Bank, in its Chalai Branch. The petitioner transferred an amount of Rs. 1 Crore from its own account to the said Current Account on 01.02.2022. The amount was not accounted. When contacted, the 2nd respondent-Branch Manager required the petitioner to furnish fresh KYC details, which were provided on 03.02.2022. The Current Account, however, was not made operational.

3. The petitioner had to make payment to Suppliers. Hence, the petitioner entrusted cheques to the 2nd respondent-Branch Manager on 10.02.2022. The petitioner was initially asked to wait for two more days to make the account operational. To the surprise of the petitioner, on 14.02.2022, the petitioner was informed as per Ext.P3 that the debit facility in the Account has been disabled and hence the transfer cannot be proce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top